Women's Status and Violence against Young Married Women in Rural Nepal

  • Prabhat Lamichhane1Email author,

    Affiliated with

    • Mahesh Puri1,

      Affiliated with

      • Jyotsna Tamang1 and

        Affiliated with

        • Bishnu Dulal1

          Affiliated with

          BMC Women's Health201111:19

          DOI: 10.1186/1472-6874-11-19

          Received: 21 September 2010

          Accepted: 25 May 2011

          Published: 25 May 2011

          Abstract

          Background

          Studies conducted around the world consistently show the existence of violence against women. Despite the increasing number of studies being conducted on violence against young married women elsewhere, this subject has received little attention from researchers and policy makers in Nepal. This paper assesses the prevalence of violence among young married women in rural Nepal. Specifically, it examines [factors related to] women's status in order to better understand the risk of violence.

          Methods

          A cross-sectional study was conducted in 2009 among 1,296 young married women aged 15-24 years in four major ethnic groups. Bivariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were used to examine the association between selected risk factors and violence.

          Results

          More than half the women (51.9%) reported having experienced some form of violence in their lifetime. One-fourth (25.3%) reported physical violence and nearly half (46.2%) reported sexual violence. Likewise, one-third (35.8%) of women reported experiencing some form of violence in the past 12 months. No or little inter-spousal communication and low autonomy of women significantly increases the odds of experiencing violence among married women.

          Conclusions

          The violence against women is quite common among young married women in rural Nepal. Although the Domestic Violence and Punishment Act 2066 has been enacted, equal attention needs to be given to increasing women's autonomy and activities that encourage inter-spousal communication. Furthermore, more research is required in Nepal that examines dynamics of violence perpetrated by husbands.

          Background

          Violence against women (VAW) has been recognized globally as a public health problem which violates human rights and incurs substantial social, economic and health costs. Though violence occurs in different forms and settings including workplace, school and community, violence at home 'domestic violence' is considered the most pervasive form [1]. Studies conducted across different countries have documented the widespread prevalence of domestic violence that includes range of physical, sexual and psychological acts perpetrated by intimate partners. Thirty five studies from different countries have revealed that one quarter to half of woman report having been physically abused by their present or former partner [2]. Likewise, a WHO multi-country study revealed 13% to 61% of women had experienced physical violence in their lifetime. Furthermore, in the majority of countries 10% to 50% of women reported being sexually abused [3]. A study conducted in Bangladesh reported that 67% of women reported experiencing domestic violence in their lifetimes and slightly more than one third of women reported experiencing violence in the past year [4].

          Though the volume of evidence has been increasing globally, very few studies have been carried out in Nepal to assess the prevalence of violence in different settings and populations. A study conducted among female adolescents, youths and adults in eight districts of Nepal reported that more than one-third of married youths (20-24 years) experienced violence at home. A higher proportion of married youth reported experiencing violence compared to unmarried youth [5]. A qualitative study conducted among two major ethnic groups in Nepal revealed that sexual violence within marriage was common and the nature of the violence varied from verbal abuse to intimidation, beating to coercive sex [6].

          Association between factors such as women's characteristics, partner's characteristics, and relationship status, and violence have been examined in past studies [3, 4, 7]. However, the limited number of studies conducted in developing countries to examine women's status and experience of violence show mixed results. For example, a study conducted in Bangladesh found that the association between women's status and domestic violence against women is highly context specific [8]. In the more culturally conservative area, higher women's individual autonomy and short-term membership in savings and credit groups were both associated with significantly elevated risks of violence. In contrast, in the less culturally conservative area, individual women's status indicators were unrelated to the risk of violence. Another study conducted in urban South India, found women's participation in social groups and vocational trainings to be positively correlated with the risk of violence [9]. Similarly, a study in Cambodia revealed that the frequency of spousal discussion and husband's control was positively correlated with violence [10].

          However, to our knowledge no previous study has explored the potential association between women's status and VAW, particularly among married young women in rural Nepal. Nepalese culture, social and religious patterns, which enforce the lower status of women in family and society, may possibly act as a catalyst for violence. Social practices of early marriage limit the education and development of women. In addition, 'arranged marriage', in which family members help select the partner is still widely practiced than 'love marriage' in which people choose their own partner.

          Furthermore, women are expected to play a subordinate, submissive and more conservative gender role in marital relationships especially in rural areas. Moreover, low status and low decision-making power of women, lack of access to resources, and information and shame in exposing certain abuses can put women at further risk of experiencing violence [11]. This is reflected in the poor health and social indicators of women in the country. For instance, the latest Demographic and Health Survey (2006) reported that only slightly more than half women were literate as compared to four-fifths of men [12]. A study on gender, caste and ethnic exclusion conducted in Nepal stated that health outcomes are directly affected by the subordinate status of women in the family [13]. Likewise, according to a Nepal Human Development Report, despite a declining trend in gender inequality, women's participation in political, economic and professional spheres remained lower than that of men [14].

          This paper examines the association between women's status (including women's education, women's occupation, inter-spousal communication, women's autonomy and attitude of women towards justification of being hit) and VAW among young married women using data from a recently conducted cross-sectional study among four major ethnic groups from rural Nepal. We hope to contribute to the limited body of population-based research on VAW in Nepal and provide evidence to policy makers, program designers and public health professionals to make informed policies and programs.

          Methods

          Data for this paper come from a cross-sectional survey, carried out in four districts - Dolkha, Sindhupalchowk, Dang and Kapilvastu of Nepal by the Centre for Research on Environment Health and Population Activities (CREHPA) in 2009. These districts were selected to represent four major ethnic groups and to reflect geographic variation and different levels of socio-economic development and cultural diversity of the country. The two groups from the hilly region (Brahmin/Chhetri and Tamang) and the two from the Terai region are Tharu and Muslims.

          In the study 1,296 married women aged 15 to 24 years were interviewed using a two-staged systematic random sampling technique. In the first stage, 48 clusters in the selected districts were chosen using population proportionate to size. In the second stage, 27 households per cluster were selected after preparing an updated list of the households with the help of community leaders. After selecting a house, a short screening questionnaire was administered to the heads of the households (who generally make the decisions in household matters) to obtain basic information on all family members including age, sex and marital status. Based on the screening questionnaire, eligible respondents (married woman aged 15-24 years) were identified and selected using systematic random sampling. A total of 5,080 households were visited to identify eligible participants. Although all eligible women (1811) were identified in the visited households, the desired sample of 1,296 was interviewed. In cases of non-availability of eligible respondents, interviews were terminated after completing a short screening questionnaire. In households with more than one eligible woman, one woman was selected randomly for interview. Interviews were conducted individually at a convenient location for the respondents, usually outside their homes, by trained female interviewers. Twelve well-trained Nepali research assistants collected the data.

          Most of the questions in the individual questionnaire administered to women were based on a 2005 WHO multi-country study [3] on woman's health and domestic violence against women which had been modified to suit the local context. The questionnaires were drafted in English and translated into Nepali, the national language of Nepal. All the translations were thoroughly checked to ensure that meaning of the original English version was retained. The core protocol and research instruments were approved by the ethical committees of the Nepal Health Research Council and the WHO Research Ethics Committee. Participants involved in the study were fully informed about the nature of the study, research objectives, and confidentiality of the data. Each participant's verbal consent was obtained regarding their participation in the study after assuring confidentiality. Interviewers orally provided contact information for organizations that address violence and conflict within marriage to all women. If any respondent ever experienced violence and sought help (either required counselling or other services) then interviewers facilitated access to an appropriate service facility or referred her to the nearest health centre. None of the eligible women refused to participate in an interview.

          In this study, the definition of violence given by the WHO was adopted [15]. It is defined as "the intentional use of physical force or power, threatened or actual, against oneself, another person, or against a group or community that either results in or has a high likelihood of resulting in injury, death, psychological harm, maldevelopment, or deprivation". Respondents were asked if they had experienced different violent acts in their lifetime as well as in the past 12 months. The acts included to measure physical violence were:

          • Slapped you or thrown something at you that could hurt you;

          • Pushed you or shoved you or pulled your hair;

          • Hit you with his fist or with something else that could hurt you;

          • Kicked you, dragged you or beaten you up;

          • Choked or burned you on purpose; and

          • Threatened to use or actually used a gun, knife or weapon against you.

          The acts included to measure sexual violence were:

          • Physically forced you to have sexual intercourse with him even when you did not want to;

          • Forced you to have sexual intercourse when you were afraid to say 'no' to sex;

          • Threatened that if you didn't have sex with him he would leave you or go to another woman; and

          • Forced you to do something sexual that you found degrading or humiliating.

          Two dichotomous dependent variables were created to assess whether or not a woman has experienced violence in her lifetime and in the past 12 months by combining physical and sexual violence. These measures were operationalized for this study as "Experience of violence in lifetime" and "Experience of violence in the past year".

          Independent variables included personal characteristics of woman, their husband, sex composition of children, media exposure, inter-spousal communication, women's attitude on 'men are justified to beat their wives', women's autonomy and household wealth status. Women's education was categorized into illiterate, literate upto primary, secondary and higher secondary and above. Women's occupation was trichotomized into housewife/no income, agriculture/daily wages/poultry farming (low income occupation) and other employment (service/small business). Woman were asked on whether or not they communicate with their husbands about seven matters including money matters, things that have happened to him in the day, things that have happened to her during the day, things that worry her, her feelings/love, things that worry him and his feelings/love. The responses were trichotomized into 'None', 'Discussed 1-3 matters' and 'Discussed 4-7 matters'. Women's attitudes on the idea that 'men are justified to beat their wives' was measured using six items including wife doesn't do household work, wife disobeys, wife refuses sex, wife asks about girlfriends, husband suspects that wife is unfaithful. A woman who believed that none of the six items justified violence was labelled as 'not accepting', a woman who believed that one to three of the items justified violence was labelled 'partially accepting' and a woman who believed that four to six items justified violence was labelled 'highly accepting'.

          We constructed a variable to approximate women's status by applying latent class analysis. We considered women's autonomy to be an underlying (or latent) variable that could not be observed directly; it could, however, be measured through the observation of various manifest variables. We used 14 manifest variables covering household decision-making, control of resources, household communications, and autonomy/mobility. We used posterior probabilities of class membership in order to assign each woman a modal class. Our analysis included three latent classes for women's autonomy. Women belonging to class 1 (highest autonomy) were most likely to be able to make their own decisions concerning allocation of household resources, contraception, medication, visits to their maternal family and group membership, as well as being most likely to be able to communicate freely with their husbands on a variety of topics. Women belonging to class 2 (medium autonomy) are generally not involved with household decision making, except in terms of contraception, and tend to have some restrictions on things like becoming a member of community groups, but they still do well in terms of communication and tend to be free to visit friends and family. Women in class 3 (lowest autonomy) are least likely to be involved with any kind of family decision making, even in terms of their own health; women in this group also feel less able to communicate with their husbands. Women were assigned to a class on the basis of posterior probabilities of class membership based on their responses to the 14 manifest variables. This method allows the woman to be separated into different groups on the basis of the underlying latent variables and allows us to see the extent to which women's autonomy affects the likelihood of experiencing violence. The household wealth index was generated from 13 indicators on household dwelling and assets. Principal component analysis was used to generate "Household Wealth Index".

          It was hypothesized that the following woman's status related factors would be associated with the increased risk of violence: ethnicity, low education level of woman, unemployed status of woman, lack of communication ability, women's accepting attitude on 'men are justified to beat their wives' and woman's autonomy. These factors were selected on the basis of literature that has examined dimensions of women's status, the association of women's status and violence and country context [1619]. In addition, the qualitative research conducted among Tharu and Brahmin ethnicities in rural Nepal reported that 'lack of education', women's inability to negotiate with their husbands', 'traditional norms and cultural values' and 'lack of cash income' were perceived as the reason for sexual violence [6].

          The dependent variable "Experience of violence in the past 12 months" was used for bivariate and multivariate analysis. The crude association between response and outcomes variables was assessed by using chi-square tests. Due to the dichotomous nature of the dependant variable, binary logistic regression was employed. In order to assess the association between women's status and VAW, we have controlled the effect of a number of factors in the model. The variables that were controlled for include current age of woman; age at marriage; type of marriage; sex composition of children; media exposure; wealth status; husband's age, education, occupation and alcohol use. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS v 13) was used to perform the data analysis.

          Results

          Characteristics of the study population

          The median age of women was 22 and more than three-fifths (63.2%) of women were 21- 24 years of age (Table 1). The median age at marriage was 17 years. Nearly three-fourths (70.1%) of the women had 'arranged marriage'. Twenty eight percent of the women were illiterate. Nearly half (46.4%) of women had at least one son. More than three-quarters (78.6%) of the women were housewives and had no cash income. Most women (86.5%) had discussed 4-7 matters with their husbands. More than half (57.3%) of the women had no or rare exposure to the mass media. Over three-quarters of the women (77.9%) had "partially accepting" attitudes on men are justified to beat their wives. Overall, one-fourth of the women were in the lower autonomy class while 37.7% were in the higher autonomy class.
          Table 1

          Descriptive Characteristics of Young Married Women aged 15-24 years and association with lifetime experiences of violence, Rural Nepal, 2009

           

          All women

          (N = 1296)

          Women with lifetime experiences of violence

          (N = 673; 51.9%)

          Women without lifetime experiences of violence

          (N = 623; 48.1%)

           

          %

          n

          %

          n

          %

          n

          Current age of women

                

             15-17

          6.1

          79

          6.1

          41

          6.1

          38

             18-20

          30.7

          398

          31.2

          210

          30.2

          188

             21-24

          63.2

          819

          62.7

          422

          63.7

          397

          Age at marriage***

                

             10-14

          7.0

          91

          8.5

          57

          5.5

          34

             15-17

          51.9

          672

          55.3

          372

          48.2

          300

             18-24

          41.1

          533

          36.3

          244

          46.4

          289

          Type of marriage

                

             Arranged marriage

          70.1

          908

          70.4

          474

          69.7

          434

             Love marriage

          29.9

          388

          29.6

          199

          30.3

          189

          Caste/ethnicity

                

             Muslim

          25.0

          324

          25.9

          174

          24.1

          150

             Tamang

          25.0

          324

          22.9

          154

          27.3

          170

             Tharu

          25.0

          324

          26.7

          180

          23.1

          144

             Brahmin/Chhetri

          25.0

          324

          24.5

          165

          25.5

          159

          Women's Education*

                

             Illiterate

          28.6

          371

          29.1

          196

          28.1

          175

             Literate up to primary

          51.2

          664

          53.6

          361

          48.6

          303

             Secondary

          16.4

          212

          14.6

          98

          18.3

          114

             Higher secondary & above

          3.8

          49

          2.7

          18

          5.0

          31

          Sex composition of children

                

             Childless

          27.2

          352

          26.4

          178

          27.9

          174

             Only daughter

          26.5

          343

          24.7

          166

          28.4

          177

             At least one son

          46.4

          601

          48.9

          329

          43.7

          272

          Women's occupation

                

             Do not earn/housewife

          78.6

          1019

          77.9

          524

          79.5

          495

             Agriculture/daily wages/poultry farming

          17.0

          220

          18.6

          125

          15.2

          95

             Other employment (service/small business)

          4.4

          57

          3.6

          24

          5.3

          33

          Inter spousal communication***

                

             None

          4.3

          56

          7.1

          48

          1.3

          8

             Discussed 1-3 matters

          9.2

          119

          10.8

          73

          7.4

          46

             Discussed 4-7 matters

          86.5

          1121

          82.0

          552

          91.3

          569

          Media exposure

                

             No/rare

          57.3

          742

          58.8

          396

          55.5

          346

             Frequent

          42.7

          554

          41.2

          277

          44.5

          277

          Women's attitude on 'Men are justified to beat their wives'*

                

             Not accepting

          12.4

          161

          10.5

          71

          14.4

          90

             Partially accepting

          77.9

          1009

          78.0

          525

          77.7

          484

             Highly accepting

          9.7

          126

          11.4

          77

          7.9

          49

          Women autonomy***

                

             Low

          25.0

          324

          28.7

          193

          21.0

          131

             Medium

          37.3

          484

          38.9

          262

          35.6

          222

             High

          37.7

          488

          32.4

          218

          43.3

          270

          Household wealth status

                

             Poorest

          19.3

          250

          18.9

          127

          19.7

          123

             Poor

          20.4

          265

          21.2

          143

          19.6

          122

             Middle

          20.0

          259

          19.9

          134

          20.1

          125

             Rich

          20.1

          261

          21.0

          141

          19.3

          120

             Richest

          20.1

          261

          19.0

          128

          21.3

          133

          Chi-square test significant at * p ≤ 0.05, *** p ≤ 0.001

          Among the women's characteristic, age at marriage, women's education, inter-spousal communication, women's opinion on 'men are justified to beat their wives' and women's autonomy was significantly associated with women's lifetime experiences of violence. The proportion of illiterate women among women with lifetime experiences of violence and those without lifetime experience of violence was almost equal (29.1% vs 28.1%). The percentage of woman who did not discuss any matters with husband was higher among women who experienced violence in lifetime than those who did not. Similarly regarding women's autonomy, 25% were from low autonomy class; this percentage was higher among women who experienced violence in lifetime than those who did not experience violence (28.7% vs 21%).

          The mean age difference between husband and wife was 3.35 years and almost half of their husbands were below 24 years of age (Table 2). More than one-tenth (13.9%) of the husbands were illiterate and one-tenth (10.7%) reported an education level higher than secondary level or above. Agriculture was the main occupation for one-fourth of the husbands. About 16 percent of women reported that their husbands consumed alcohol often. Husband's age, education and alcohol was found to be significantly associated with lifetime experience of violence.
          Table 2

          Husband's characteristics of young married women aged 15-24 years and association with lifetime experiences of violence, Rural Nepal, 2009

           

          All women (N = 1296)

          Women with lifetime experiences of violence

          (N = 673; 51.9%)

          Women without lifetime experiences of violence

          (N = 623; 48.1%)

           

          %

          n

          %

          n

          %

          n

          Current age of husband**

                

             15-24

          49.7

          644

          49.0

          330

          50.4

          314

             25-34

          47.4

          614

          46.7

          314

          48.2

          300

             35+

          2.9

          38

          4.3

          29

          1.4

          9

          Husband's education***

                

             Illiterate

          13.9

          180

          15.8

          106

          11.9

          74

             Literate up to primary

          53.6

          695

          57.1

          384

          49.9

          311

             Secondary

          21.8

          282

          18.6

          125

          25.2

          157

             Higher secondary and above

          10.7

          139

          8.6

          58

          13.0

          81

          Husband's occupation

                

             Unemployed

          4.9

          63

          4.8

          32

          5.0

          31

             Agriculture

          26.6

          345

          29.1

          196

          23.9

          149

             Daily wage labor

          20.1

          261

          21.5

          145

          18.6

          116

             Services

          21.1

          274

          19.9

          134

          22.5

          140

             Foreign employment

          20.1

          260

          18.0

          121

          22.3

          139

             Business

          7.2

          93

          6.7

          45

          7.7

          48

          Husband's alcohol use***

                

             Often

          15.7

          203

          19.5

          131

          11.6

          72

             Sometimes

          22.4

          290

          22.7

          153

          22.0

          137

             Never/rarely

          62.0

          803

          57.8

          389

          66.5

          414

          Chi-square test significant at ** p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001

          Prevalence and nature of violence

          Overall, more than half of young married women (51.9%) reported having ever experienced some type of violence from their husbands (Table 3). Nearly half (46.2%) reported sexual violence and one-fourth (25.3%) reported physical violence. Nearly one in five (19.6%) women reported ever experiencing both sexual and physical violence. In terms of sexual violence experienced in a woman's lifetime, physically forcing her to have sexual intercourse when she did not want to was the most commonly reported act (44.9%). About one-fourth (24.8%) of women reported ever experiencing forceful sexual intercourse when they were afraid to say 'no'. More than one in ten women reported that the husband had kicked, dragged or beaten them.
          Table 3

          Prevalence of violence against young married women according to type of violence, Rural Nepal, 2009

          Type of violence

          Lifetime %

          (N = 1296)

          Past 12 months %

          (N = 1296)

          Slapped you or thrown something at you that could hurt you

          15.0

          9.3

          Pushed you or shoved you or pulled your hair

          15.7

          11.4

          Hit you with his fist or with something else that could hurt you

          5.9

          3.7

          Kicked you, dragged you or beaten you up

          11.0

          8.1

          Choked or burnt you on purpose

          0.9

          0.6

          Threatened to use or actually used a gun, knife or other weapon against you

          0.9

          0.6

          Physical violence: at least one type

          25.3

          17.4

          Physically force you to have sexual intercourse with him even when you did not want to

          44.9

          29.7

          Force you for sexual intercourse when you were afraid to say 'no' for sex because of fear that he would do something

          24.8

          19.0

          Threaten you that if you didn't have sex with him he would leave you or go to another woman

          9.8

          6.9

          Force you to do something sexual that you found degrading or humiliating

          13.5

          12.1

          Sexual violence: at least one type

          46.2

          31.3

          Experienced either physical or sexual

          51.9

          35.8

          More than one-third of women (35.8%) reported experiencing violence in the past 12 months. Sexual violence was reported by 31.3% of women and physical violence was reported by 17.4%. The pattern of the nature of violence was similar between lifetime experience and experience in the past 12 months. Similar to lifetime experience, the most common violent act was forceful sexual intercourse with more than one-fourth (29.7%) of women reporting to have experienced the act in the past 12 months. More than one in ten (11.4%) reported that the husband pushed or shoved them or pulled their hair in the past 12 months.

          Association between selected factors and violence in the past 12 months

          The association of women's status related factors with experience of VAW in the past 12 months was examined (Table 4). Nearly one-fourth of Brahmin/Chhetri women experienced violence in the past 12 months whereas the proportion was 47.2% among Tharu. Likewise, about two in five illiterate woman experienced violence in the past 12 months. One third (34.2%) of women who had no earnings or were housewives experienced violence in the past 12 months, whereas the proportion was nearly one fifth (19.3%) among women in service or small businesses. The results showed that women who had no spousal communication were at increased risk of experiencing violence than women who discussed 4-7 matters (75% vs. 31.9%). Regarding autonomy and experience of violence in the past 12 months, 45.1% of woman in lower autonomy class experienced violence whereas the proportion was 28.3% among woman in higher autonomy class.
          Table 4

          Percentage of young married women Nepal reporting experiences of violence in the past 12 months by selected characteristics, Rural Nepal, 2009

          Characteristics of women

          Past year %

          N

          Caste/ethnicity***

            

          Brahmin/Chhetri

          23.1

          324

          Tamang

          27.5

          324

          Tharu

          47.2

          324

          Muslim

          45.4

          324

          Women's education***

            

          Illiterate

          39.1

          371

          Literate up to primary

          38.1

          664

          Secondary

          26.9

          212

          Higher secondary and above

          18.4

          49

          Women's occupation***

            

          Do not earn/housewife

          34.2

          1019

          Agriculture/daily wages/poultry farming

          47.7

          220

          Other employment (service/small business)

          19.3

          57

          Inter spousal communication***

            

          None

          75.0

          56

          Discussed 1-3 matters

          53.8

          119

          Discussed 4-7 matters

          31.9

          1121

          Men are justified to beat their wives

            

          Not accepting

          33.5

          161

          Partially accepting

          35.2

          1009

          Highly accepting

          43.7

          126

          Women's autonomy***

            

          Low

          45.1

          488

          Medium

          37.2

          484

          High

          28.3

          324

          Total

          35.8

          1296

          Chi-square test significant at * p ≤ 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.01; ** *p ≤ 0.001

          Multivariate analysis

          The association between women's status related factors and experience of violence was assessed using logistic models for experience of violence in the past 12 months. The results are presented in Table 5.
          Table 5

          Odds ratio (and 95% confidence intervals) from binary logistic regression of selected risk factors with experience of violence a

          Characteristics of women

          Experience of violence in the past 12 months

           

          OR

          95.0% C.I

          Ethnicity

            

          Muslim

          1.91

          1.04- 3.53

          Tamang

          0.80

          0.48- 1.32

          Tharu

          1.61

          0.93- 2.78

          Brahmin/Chhetri (Ref)

            

          Women's Education

            

          Illiterate

          0.75

          0.29- 1.97

          Literate up to primary

          1.11

          0.45- 2.76

          Secondary

          1.17

          0.48- 2.82

          Higher secondary and above (Ref)

            

          Women's occupation

            

          Do not earn/housewife

          1.44

          0.68-3.02

          Agriculture/daily wages/poultry farming

          2.17

          0.97- 4.85

          Other employment (service/small business) (Ref.)

            

          Inter spousal communication

            

          None

          6.82

          3.45- 13.48

          Discussed 1-3 matters

          2.33

          1.52- 3.58

          Discussed 4-7 matters (Ref.)

            

          Men are justified to beat their wives

            

          Not accepting

          0.61

          0.34- 1.07

          Partially accepting

          0.72

          0.47- 1.11

          Highly accepting (Ref.)

            

          Women's autonomy

            

          Low

          1.65

          1.08- 2.5

          Medium

          1.88

          1.33- 2.64

          High (Ref.)

            

          a Controlled for current age of women, age at marriage, type of marriage, sex composition of children, media exposure, household wealth status, current age of husband, husband's education, husband's occupation and husband's alcohol use

          Similar to the bivariate results, Muslim women were significantly more likely to experience violence as opposed to Brahmin/Chhetri women. Women's education was not significantly associated with the experience of violence. However, experience of violence was significantly associated with women in low income occupations. The risk of violence was more than two-fold among women who were in agriculture or daily wage occupation as compared to women who were in service or small businesses. The correlation between women's education and women's occupation was investigated by rank correlation coefficients which did not reveal significant correlation (Spearman's rho= 0.032).

          The odd of experiencing violence was six times higher among women who had no communication than woman who report discussing 4-7 matters with their husbands. Similar to the bivariate results, the multivariate results did not show an association between women's attitude of woman on 'men are justified to beat their wives' and experience of violence. However, women's autonomy was associated with experience of violence as women with lower autonomy were more likely to experience violence as opposed to women with the higher autonomy.

          Discussion

          The prevalence of violence found in this study was similar to what was found in other developing countries as more than half of young women in rural Nepal experienced some type of violence in their lifetime [3]. Based on type, more women experienced sexual violence compared to physical and emotional violence. This was consistent with findings from a multi-country study in Ethiopia, Bangladesh and Thailand [3].

          Our study focused on examining the association between women's status-related factors and the experience of violence. Women's autonomy and inter-spousal communication were revealed to be significant predictors of violence, whereas education was not. With regard to ethnicity, Muslim women were at a significantly higher risk of experiencing violence whereas Tamang woman were found to be at lower risk compared to other ethnicities. This may be due to the underlying socio-religious practices among Muslim women who are more restricted to their conservative gender roles as compared to Tamang and Brahmin woman.

          Results did not show an association between education and experience of violence in the multivariate analysis. This finding is difficult to interpret and needs further exploration. Educated women may be less likely to accept traditional gender roles and could be more vocal in their response to violence which may be taken as a transgression in a male-dominated Nepalese society. Studies conducted elsewhere have also presented conflicting results with some studies showing higher education to be protective while others show higher education as a risk factor [17, 20, 21]. The lack of association seen in our results may also be explained by findings from other studies [22, 23] which have shown that difference in educational level between husband and wife is responsible for violence experience by woman. When the variable for women's educational level was replaced with a relative educational attainment in the logistic regression model, the results showed that women with higher educational levels than their husbands were at higher risk of experiencing violence as compared to women whose husband had higher education than them.

          Likewise, though unemployed women were expected to be at higher risk, results showed woman in agriculture/daily wages/poultry farming occupations to be at higher risk of experiencing violence in the past 12 months. Involvement of women in economic activities may have been considered a factor challenging women's propriety and modesty and it may have acted as provocative rather than protective factor. Inter-spousal communication was a strong predictor of violence experience in the past 12 months. Results showed that women with no or little communication faced a significantly higher likelihood of violence. Married at an early age, women in Nepal are expected to be submissive, quiet, disciplined and loyal to the husband. In addition, women may be less empowered to protect themselves against violence as a result of young age at marriage. This may result in ineffective communication with husbands. Studies conducted in Egypt and other countries have also reported the inability of women to effectively communicate their problems and misunderstandings as a trigger for sexual violence [24, 25]. However, contrary to our research findings, a study from Cambodia reported higher odds of violence with increased communication between partners [9]. As expected, both the bivariate and multivariate results found that women's autonomy was a significant predictor of violence. Higher autonomy was protective of the violence whereas lower autonomy increased the odds of violence experience. These results are consistent with those in Bangladesh and South Africa [10, 22].

          Although this study provides the most comprehensive information to date on the prevalence and association of women's status with violence in Nepal, potential limitations of the study need to be acknowledged. First, because of the cross-sectional nature of the study design, neither causal nor temporal ordering of the associations can be inferred. Second, although the research assistants had been adequately trained in interviewing and rapport building; violence experience may have been underreported because of the sensitivity of the subject.

          Conclusions

          Marriage is thought to protect women from violence. However, our study results demonstrate that VAW is a significant public health problem in rural Nepal affecting more than half of 'young married women' thus demonstrating the magnitude of the problem. The main focus of our analysis was on women's status related variables and experience of violence which revealed that no or little inter-spousal communication and low autonomy of women increased the odds of violence experience among young married women. Although the Domestic Violence and Punishment Act 2066 [26] has been enacted, these results suggest that equal attention needs to be given to activities improving women's autonomy. Educational campaigns focused on redefining the roles of women in the family and society may help improve the status of women, however, the possible repercussions of the proposed intervention needs to be well considered. Interventions promoting inter-spousal communication may help prevent violence perpetrated by husbands. Overall, further research is needed in Nepal to understand dynamics of women's status, its association with different socio-religious practices and experience of violence. In addition, longitudinal studies examining the status of women since marriage can provider better insight into the dynamics of violence.

          Declarations

          Acknowledgements

          We would like to acknowledge with gratitude UNDP/UNFPA/WHO/World Bank Special Programme in Human Reproduction, Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva, for the financial and technical support to the study. We are grateful to Dr. Iqbal Shah, WHO for support and suggestions throughout the study and providing comments on the draft version of this manuscript. We would also like to thank Dr. Shireen Jejeebhoy, Population Council, India for providing suggestions on the survey questionnaire. We would like to thank Ms. Catherine Packer for editing the manuscript and providing valuable suggestions.

          Authors’ Affiliations

          (1)
          1Center for Research on Environment Health and Population Activities, Kusunti

          References

          1. Heise L, Ellsberg M, Gottmoeller M: A global overview of gender based violence. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2002,78(Supp 1):S5-S14.PubMedView Article
          2. Heise LL, Pitanguy J, Germain A: Violence against Women, The Hidden Health Burden. World Bank Discussion Paper. World Bank; 1994.
          3. World Health Organization (WHO): WHO Multi-country Study on Women's Health and Domestic Violence against Women. World Health Organization; 2005.
          4. Bates LM, Schuler SR, Islam F, Islam MK: Socioeconomic Factors and Processes Associated With Domestic Violence in Rural Bangladesh. International Family Planning Perspectives 2004,30(4):190–199.PubMedView Article
          5. Poudel GS: Domestic Violence against Women in Nepal. Gender Technology and Development 2007,11(2):199–233.View Article
          6. Puri M, Tamang J: Exploring the Nature and Reasons Associated with Sexual Violence within Marriage among Young Couples in Nepal. Summary Report. Center for Research on Environment Health and Population Activities; 2008.
          7. Ellsberg M, PenA R, Herrera A, Lilijestrand J, Winkvist A: Candies in hell: women's experiences of violence in Nicaragua. Social Science and Medicine 2000, 51:1995–1610.
          8. Koenig M, Hossain MB, Ahmed S, Haaga S: Individual and Community level determinants of violence in Rural Bangladesh. Hopkins Population Center Papers on Population; 1999.
          9. Rocca CH, Rathod S, Falle T, Pande RP, Krishnan S: Challenging assumptions about women's empowerment: social and economic resources and domestic violence among young married women in urban South India. International Journal of Epidemiology 2009, 38:577–585.PubMedView Article
          10. Eng S, Li Y, Muslow M, Fischer J: Domestic violence against women in Cambodia: Husband's control, frequency of spousal discussion, and domestic violence reported by Cambodian Women. Journal of Family Violence 2010, 25:237–246.View Article
          11. Pradhananga RB, Shrestha P: [http://​www.​childtrafficking​.​com/​Docs/​domestic_​violence_​0607.​pdf] Domestic Violence against Women in Nepal: Concept, History and Existing Laws. Accessed 28 June 2010
          12. Ministry of Health and Population: Nepal Demographic Health Survey. New Era and Macro International; 2007.
          13. Department for International Development (DFID) and The World Bank (WB): Unequal citizens Gender, Caste and Ethnic exclusion in Nepal: Executive Summary. WB; 2006.
          14. United Nations Development Programme: [http://​www.​undp.​org.​np/​publication/​html/​nhdr2009/​Cover.​pdf] Nepal Human Development Report State Transformation and Development. 2009. Accessed 28 June 2010.
          15. World Health Organization: World Report on Violence and Health. WHO Geneva; 2002.
          16. Koenig MA, Ahmed S, Hossain MB, Mozumder KA: Women's status and domestic violence in Rural Bangladesh: individual - and community-level effects. Demography 2003,40(2):269–288.View Article
          17. Jewkes R: Intimate Partner Violence: Causes and Prevention. The Lancet 2002, 359:1423–29.View Article
          18. Bloom SS, Wypij D, Gupta Md: Dimensions of Women's autonomy and influence of maternal health care utilization in a North Indian City. Demography 2001,38(1):67–78.PubMedView Article
          19. Kabeer N: Resources, Agency, Achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women's empowerment. Development and Change 1999, 30:435–464.View Article
          20. Martin EK, Taft CT, Resick PA: A review of marital rape. Aggression and Violent Behavior 2007, 12:329–347.View Article
          21. Deyessa N, Berhane Y, Ellsberg M, Emmelin M, Kullgren G, Hogberg U: Violence against women in relation to literay and area of residence in Ethiopia. Global Health Action 2010, 3:2070.
          22. Choi SYP, Ting KF: Wife Beating in South Africa: An Imbalance Theory of Resources and Power. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 2008, 23:834–852.PubMedView Article
          23. Brownridge DA: Partner Violence Against Women With Disabilities: Prevalence, Risk, and Explanations. Violence against Women 2006,12(9):805–822.PubMedView Article
          24. Nafissatu DS, Campbell JC, Becker S: Domestic Violence against women in Egypt- Wife beating and health outcomes. Social Science and Medicine 2006, 62:1260–1277.View Article
          25. Kishor S, Kiersten J: Profiling Domestic Violence - A Multi-Country Study. ORC Macro; 2004.
          26. Domestic Violence (Offence and Punishment) Act, 2066 [http://​www.​lawcommission.​gov.​np/​index.​php?​option=​com_​remository&​Itemid=​18&​func=​fileinfo&​id=​424&​lang=​en] 2009.
          27. Pre-publication history

            1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://​www.​biomedcentral.​com/​1472-6874/​11/​19/​prepub

          Copyright

          © Lamichhane et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

          This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.