Contraceptive methods and use by women aged 35 and over: A qualitative study of perspectives
© Godfrey et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 1 June 2010
Accepted: 16 February 2011
Published: 16 February 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|1 Jun 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|10 Aug 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Deborah Oakley|
|6 Sep 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tessa Madden|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|11 Dec 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Deborah Oakley|
|11 Jan 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tessa Madden|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|12 Feb 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Emily Maria Godfrey|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|12 Feb 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|16 Feb 2011||Editorially accepted|
|16 Feb 2011||Article published||10.1186/1472-6874-11-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.