Barriers to condom use among women at risk of HIV/AIDS: a qualitative study from Iran
© Lotfi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 6 August 2011
Accepted: 20 March 2012
Published: 24 May 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|6 Aug 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|7 Aug 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Razieh Lotfi|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|7 Aug 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|12 Sep 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mzikazi Nduna|
|21 Oct 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Webster Mavhu|
|9 Dec 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Razieh Lotfi|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|9 Dec 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|31 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mzikazi Nduna|
|10 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Webster Mavhu|
|6 Mar 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Razieh Lotfi|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|6 Mar 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|20 Mar 2012||Editorially accepted|
|24 May 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6874-12-13|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.