Secular trends in age at menarche and time to establish regular menstrual cycling in Japanese women born between 1930 and 1985
© Hosokawa et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 7 April 2011
Accepted: 30 June 2012
Published: 16 July 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|7 Apr 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|25 Aug 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Premananda Bharati|
|26 Nov 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ken Ong|
|21 Dec 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Michie Hosokawa|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|21 Dec 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|13 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ken Ong|
|13 May 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Michie Hosokawa|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|13 May 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|13 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ken Ong|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|30 Jun 2012||Editorially accepted|
|16 Jul 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6874-12-19|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.