“Voices of Fear and Safety” Women’s ambivalence towards breast cancer and breast health: a qualitative study from Jordan
© Taha et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 8 December 2011
Accepted: 12 July 2012
Published: 26 July 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|8 Dec 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|8 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Maggi Banning|
|23 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ruth Heisey|
|20 Jun 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Hana Taha|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|20 Jun 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|Resubmission - Version 7|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 7|
|8 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ruth Heisey|
|9 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Maggi Banning|
|Resubmission - Version 8|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 8|
|12 Jul 2012||Editorially accepted|
|26 Jul 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6874-12-21|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.