Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Estimation of menstrual blood loss volume based on menstrual diary and laboratory data

  • Ulrike Schumacher1, 2Email author,
  • Jens Schumacher3,
  • Uwe Mellinger4,
  • Christoph Gerlinger4,
  • Andreas Wienke5 and
  • Jan Endrikat6, 7
BMC Women's Health201212:24

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6874-12-24

Received: 5 June 2012

Accepted: 13 July 2012

Published: 20 August 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
5 Jun 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
26 Jun 2012 Author responded Author comments - Ulrike Schumacher
Resubmission - Version 3
26 Jun 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 Jul 2012 Editorially accepted
20 Aug 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6874-12-24

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Medical Affairs Support, Jenapharm GmbH und Co
Center for Clinical Studies, Universitätsklinikum Jena
Institute of Stochastics, University of Jena
Global Clinical Statistics, Bayer Pharma AG
Institute for Medical Epidemiology, Biometrics and Computer Science, Universitätsklinikum Halle
Global Medical Affairs, Bayer Pharma AG
Department of OBGYN, Saarland University