Cryo-thawed embryo transfer: natural versus artificial cycle. A non-inferiority trial.(ANTARCTICA trial)
© Groenewoud et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 1 November 2011
Accepted: 31 August 2012
Published: 5 September 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|1 Nov 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|18 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hesham Al-Inany|
|25 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ariel Weissman|
|1 May 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Eva Groenewoud|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|1 May 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|16 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ariel Weissman|
|21 Aug 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Eva Groenewoud|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|21 Aug 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|31 Aug 2012||Editorially accepted|
|5 Sep 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6874-12-27|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.