Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Cryo-thawed embryo transfer: natural versus artificial cycle. A non-inferiority trial.(ANTARCTICA trial)

BMC Women's Health201212:27

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6874-12-27

Received: 1 November 2011

Accepted: 31 August 2012

Published: 5 September 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 Nov 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
18 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hesham Al-Inany
25 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ariel Weissman
1 May 2012 Author responded Author comments - Eva Groenewoud
Resubmission - Version 3
1 May 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
16 May 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ariel Weissman
21 Aug 2012 Author responded Author comments - Eva Groenewoud
Resubmission - Version 4
21 Aug 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
31 Aug 2012 Editorially accepted
5 Sep 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6874-12-27

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
UMCG
(2)
Complete Fertility Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Human Development and Health, University of Southampton
(3)
Fertility Centre Isala Clinics
(4)
the ANTARCTICA trial study group

Advertisement