Social support for women of reproductive age and its predictors: a population-based study
© Baheiraei et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 10 August 2011
Accepted: 31 July 2012
Published: 18 September 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|10 Aug 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|4 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - XinQi Dong|
|22 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kristina Orth-Gomer|
|21 May 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Mojgan Mirghafourvand|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|21 May 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|2 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - XinQi Dong|
|21 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kristina Orth-Gomer|
|23 Jul 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Mojgan Mirghafourvand|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|23 Jul 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|31 Jul 2012||Editorially accepted|
|18 Sep 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6874-12-30|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.