Development of a diagnostic test set to assess agreement in breast pathology: practical application of the Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS)
© Oster et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 1 October 2012
Accepted: 18 January 2013
Published: 5 February 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|1 Oct 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|8 Oct 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Natalia Oster|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|8 Oct 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|7 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anna Sapino|
|27 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - antonio rizzo|
|8 Jan 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Natalia Oster|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|8 Jan 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|14 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - antonio rizzo|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|18 Jan 2013||Editorially accepted|
|5 Feb 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6874-13-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.