Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Differences in patterns of high-risk human papillomavirus infection between urban and rural low-resource settings: cross-sectional findings from Mali

  • Nicholas H Schluterman1,
  • Samba O Sow1, 2,
  • Cheick B Traore3,
  • Kamate Bakarou3,
  • Rokiatou Dembelé2,
  • Founé Sacko3,
  • Patti E Gravitt4 and
  • J Kathleen Tracy1Email author
BMC Women's Health201313:4

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6874-13-4

Received: 27 July 2012

Accepted: 10 January 2013

Published: 6 February 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
27 Jul 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
31 Jul 2012 Author responded Author comments - Nicholas Schluterman
Resubmission - Version 3
31 Jul 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
24 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paolo Giorgi Rossi
8 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Julia Gage
9 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kate Soldan
17 Dec 2012 Author responded Author comments - Nicholas Schluterman
Resubmission - Version 4
17 Dec 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
30 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paolo Giorgi Rossi
4 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Julia Gage
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
10 Jan 2013 Editorially accepted
6 Feb 2013 Article published 10.1186/1472-6874-13-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine
(2)
Centre Pour Le Developpement Des Vaccins
(3)
Institut National de Recherche en Santé Publique
(4)
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

Advertisement