Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Women’s perceptions and reasons for choosing the pill, patch, or ring in the CHOICE study: a cross-sectional survey of contraceptive method selection after counseling

  • Christian Egarter1Email author,
  • Brigitte Frey Tirri2,
  • Johannes Bitzer3,
  • Vyacheslav Kaminskyy4,
  • Björn J Oddens5,
  • Vera Prilepskaya6,
  • Arie Yeshaya7,
  • Maya Marintcheva-Petrova8 and
  • Steven Weyers9
BMC Women's Health201313:9

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6874-13-9

Received: 18 October 2012

Accepted: 15 February 2013

Published: 28 February 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
18 Oct 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
19 Oct 2012 Author responded Author comments - Christian Egarter
Resubmission - Version 3
19 Oct 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
19 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lete Ignacio
13 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rebecca Say
29 Jan 2013 Author responded Author comments - Christian Egarter
Resubmission - Version 4
29 Jan 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
1 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rebecca Say
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
15 Feb 2013 Editorially accepted
28 Feb 2013 Article published 10.1186/1472-6874-13-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Medical University of Vienna
(2)
Frauenklinik, Kantonsspital Baselland
(3)
Frauenklinik, Universitätsspital Basel
(4)
P.L. Shupik National Medical Academy of Post-Graduate Education
(5)
Global Medical Affairs, Merck, Sharpe & Dohme Corp.
(6)
Scientific Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
(7)
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University
(8)
Biostatistics and Research Decision Sciences, Merck, Sharpe & Dohme Corp.
(9)
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ghent University Hospital

Advertisement