Knowledge, attitude and practice about cancer of the uterine cervix among women living in Kinshasa, the Democratic Republic of Congo
- Catherine Ali-Risasi1, 2Email author,
- Paul Mulumba^3,
- Kristien Verdonck4,
- Davy Vanden Broeck5 and
- Marleen Praet2
© Ali-Risasi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 20 June 2013
Accepted: 13 February 2014
Published: 18 February 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|20 Jun 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|29 Aug 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - serena donati|
|30 Sep 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj|
|5 Dec 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Catherine Ali-Risasi|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|5 Dec 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|23 Dec 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - serena donati|
|7 Feb 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Catherine Ali-Risasi|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|7 Feb 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|12 Feb 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Catherine Ali-Risasi|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|12 Feb 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|13 Feb 2014||Editorially accepted|
|18 Feb 2014||Article published||10.1186/1472-6874-14-30|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.