Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Are women and providers satisfied with antenatal care? Views on a standard and a simplified, evidence-based model of care in four developing countries

  • Ana Langer1Email author,
  • José Villar2,
  • Mariana Romero3,
  • Gustavo Nigenda4,
  • Gilda Piaggio2,
  • Chusri Kuchaisit5,
  • Georgina Rojas6,
  • Muneera Al-Osimi7,
  • José Miguel Belizán7,
  • Ubaldo Farnot8,
  • Yagob Al-Mazrou9,
  • Guillermo Carroli3,
  • Hassan Ba'aqeel11,
  • Pisake Lumbiganon5,
  • Alain Pinol2,
  • Per Bergsjö10,
  • Leiv Bakketeig11,
  • Jo Garcia12 and
  • Heinz Berendes^13
^Deceased
BMC Women's Health20022:7

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6874-2-7

Received: 26 April 2002

Accepted: 19 July 2002

Published: 19 July 2002

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
26 Apr 2002 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
16 May 2002 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Caroline Homer
24 May 2002 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Arden Handler
25 Jun 2002 Author responded Author comments - Ana Langer
Resubmission - Version 3
25 Jun 2002 Submitted Manuscript version 3
8 Jul 2002 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Arden Handler
16 Jul 2002 Author responded Author comments - Ana Langer
Resubmission - Version 4
16 Jul 2002 Submitted Manuscript version 4
18 Jul 2002 Author responded Author comments - Ana Langer
Resubmission - Version 5
18 Jul 2002 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
19 Jul 2002 Editorially accepted
19 Jul 2002 Article published 10.1186/1472-6874-2-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Regional Office for Latin America and the Caribbean, The Population Council
(2)
Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, World Health Organization
(3)
Centro Rosarino de Estudios Perinatales
(4)
Fundación Mexicana para la Salud
(5)
Khon Kaen University
(6)
Hospital Gineco-Obstétrico "América Arias"
(7)
Latin American Centre for Perinatology and Human Development
(8)
Hospital Gineco-Obstétrico "América Arias"
(9)
Ministry of Health
(10)
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Bergen
(11)
National Institute of Public Health
(12)
National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Oxford University
(13)
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development

Advertisement