Volume 4 Supplement 1
The Impact of Arthritis on Canadian Women
© Badley and Kasman; licensee BioMed Central Ltd 2004
Published: 25 August 2004
Arthritis is one of the most prevalent chronic conditions in Canada and a leading cause of long-term disability, pain, and increased health care utilization. It is also a far more prevalent condition among women than men. Information was obtained primarily from the 1998–99 National Population Health Survey and the Canadian Joint Replacement Registry.
In 1998, the overall prevalence of self-reported arthritis or rheumatism in Canadian women was 20.0%. This rate increased to 55.6% among women over 75 years of age. Compared to women with chronic conditions, women with arthritis were more likely to experience long-term disability; report worse health; experience more pain; be dependent upon others and consult general practitioners, specialists, and physiotherapists more frequently. While men and women with arthritis under-utilize total joint replacement surgery, the degree of under-use was over three times greater for women.
Data Gaps and Recommendations
There is a lack of detailed information on the use of health care services by women with arthritis. There are also no systematic data available on the prescribing of medications, access to services such as assistive devices or exercise programs, or use of community support, self-management strategies, or rehabilitation services. The burden of arthritis both on women and on society is expected to increase as the population ages. A comprehensive health strategy to reduce the impact of arthritis is required to ensure that health and support services are available in a timely manner and provided in such a way to meet the needs of Canadian women.
Arthritis is currently one of the most prevalent chronic conditions in Canada and is a leading cause of long-term disability, pain, and increased health care utilization[1, 2] The term "arthritis" is defined as "inflammation of the joints," and it encompasses over 100 different conditions. Some conditions included under the "arthritis and rheumatism" designation are osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, fibromyalgia and systemic lupus erythematosus. The most common symptoms of arthritis are joint pain, stiffness, swelling and muscle weakness; these symptoms can lead to joint damage, which may limit the range of movement and/or deform the joint [3–5].
Arthritis is a far more prevalent condition among women than among men [6–10]. Findings from numerous studies have shown that rheumatoid arthritis affects up to 2.5 times as many women as men and that the female:male ratio for osteoarthritis is approximately 2:1[9, 11–16]. While there is currently no known cure for arthritis or rheumatism, there are various treatments available, including drugs, surgery, rehabilitation and self-management, that have been shown to prevent long-term disability, maintain function and reduce the pain that is associated with these conditions.
This chapter presents information on the status and impact of arthritis and rheumatism on women in Canada. The impact of the disease will be measured in terms of ill health, pain, long-term disability and health care utilization. In order to set the data on arthritis in women in a broader population health context, we also present data on men with arthritis and various subgroups of women, including those with chronic conditions other than arthritis and those who report no chronic conditions. The information presented in this report has been obtained primarily from analysis of data from the 1998–1999 National Population Health Survey (NPHS) as well as from the Canadian Joint Replacement Registry.
The analyses in this chapter are based on the cross-sectional household data from the third cycle (1998–1999) of the NPHS (see Appendix A). Data from the health file for the 14,682 selected respondents who were over the age of 15 were weighted – taking into account the sample design, adjustments for non-response and post-stratification – to represent about 23.8 million Canadians.
Arthritis was identified in the NPHS by asking respondents whether they had arthritis or rheumatism as a long-term chronic condition (defined as a condition diagnosed by a health professional that had lasted, or was expected to last, six months or more). Individuals were also asked early in the survey to report their sex (male/female); answers to all subsequent questions could thus be linked to each individual's response.
The Canadian Joint Replacement Registry (CJRR) is a fairly new, national registry (launched in June 2000) that collects information on total hip and total knee replacement surgeries performed in Canada and follows joint replacement recipients over time to monitor outcomes. The CJRR is a joint effort between the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) and the orthopaedic surgeons of Canada.
According to data from the 1998–1999 NPHS, almost 4 million individuals over the age of 15 reported having arthritis that had been diagnosed by a health professional, two thirds of these individuals (approximately 2.4 million) being women. This represents a disease prevalence among women of 20%, which was almost double the percentage of men who reported the condition (12%).
In terms of marital status, 40% of women who were widowed or divorced reported the presence of arthritis, whereas less than 6% of single women did so. This is likely a function of the age distribution of women with arthritis. A substantial proportion (44%) of working-age women (between 16 and 64 years of age) with arthritis and 33% of men with arthritis reported not currently being in the labour force, as compared with the 21% of women who reported chronic conditions other than arthritis and 18% of women who reported no chronic conditions.
Long-Term Disability and Health Status
Approximately 45% of women with arthritis reported pain that prevented at least some activities, and 21% reported that pain prevented them from participating in all or most activities. Rates among women and men with arthritis were quite similar in terms of the experience of pain. Women who reported chronic conditions other than arthritis or who reported no chronic conditions were far less likely to experience pain – 87% and 96% respectively reporting that no activities were limited as a result of pain.
When individuals were asked whether, because of any condition or health problems, they required assistance to accomplish a variety of tasks (including personal care, household chores, shopping, etc.), 43% of women with arthritis reported that they were dependent upon others to assist them with one or more of these activities. Only 30% of men with arthritis, less than 13% of women with other chronic conditions and 3% of women with no chronic conditions reported a need for assistance.
Health Care Utilization
In terms of allied health care services, both women and men with arthritis and women with other chronic conditions were equally likely – approximately 13% in all groups – to have consulted a chiropractor at least once in the previous year. However, women with arthritis reported having visited a physiotherapist more frequently than either men with arthritis, women with chronic conditions other than arthritis or women with no chronic conditions.
When individuals with arthritis were asked specifically about what treatment, if any, they used to care for their arthritis, almost 50% of women reported that they had used some treatment, slightly higher than the 46% of males who had done so. Arthritis treatment options were further broken down into specific types. Approximately equal proportions of both sexes had used medication (43%), whereas women reported using diet and exercise more frequently than men. The 1998–1999 NPHS also asked about the use of some specific types of medications. Women with arthritis were more likely than men with arthritis and women with other chronic conditions to report the use of pain medications (80% versus 73% and 74% respectively) and antidepressants (11% versus 5% and 7% respectively) but equally likely as men with arthritis to report the use of medications containing codeine (9% for both).
Characteristics of Women with Arthritis
Women in Canada report arthritis more frequently than men. According to the NPHS, compared with women with other chronic conditions, women with arthritis were older, had lower incomes and fewer years of education and were more likely to be widowed and out of the labour force. Consequently, it appears that the women who are experiencing arthritis may be the women with the fewest resources to deal with the impact of the condition on their daily lives. In terms of the health impacts of arthritis, women with the disease were far more likely to experience long-term disability than women with other chronic conditions. They also reported poorer health, experienced more pain that restricted activity, and consulted with GPs, specialists and physiotherapists more frequently.
The prevalence of arthritis increases so dramatically with age that many older people consider the disease to be a normal aspect of aging until it becomes sufficiently painful and/or debilitating to prompt medical care. However, it is a misconception that arthritis is a disease only of the elderly, since the largest number of individuals with arthritis is in the age range 45 to 64. Another common misconception is that arthritis is an inevitable part of growing old for which nothing can be done. Although there is, at present, no known cure for arthritis, appropriate treatment helps to prevent long-term disability, maintain function and reduce pain. For some types of arthritis, particularly rheumatoid arthritis, a rheumatologist may best manage treatment, while total joint replacement surgery is an effective therapy for those with advanced osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. As well, self-management strategies, including exercise and education, have been shown to help reduce pain and long-term disability and to decrease the need for medications.
Health Care Utilization
Despite the well-documented benefits of the various available treatments for arthritis, surveys have repeatedly shown that between 40% and 60% of individuals with self-reported joint symptoms or signs of arthritis or rheumatism are not receiving treatment. The reason behind the relatively low percentage of individuals with arthritis or rheumatism who see a health professional is unknown, but rates of health care utilization have been shown to be affected by a wide variety of factors, including sex, age and socio-economic status.
It is difficult to make comparisons between men and women about the use of health care services for arthritis because basic sex differences in prevalence rates and/or disease severity must be taken into account. For example, despite the slightly higher rate of TJR among women, a recent Canadian study found that although there is under-use of TJR in both sexes, once disease prevalence and need are accounted for, the degree of under-use is more than three times as great in women as in men.
The issue of health care utilization by those with arthritis is of particular importance since recent research done in the United States has suggested that individuals with arthritis who receive appropriate care (such as care from a rheumatologist) experience lower rates of long-term disability than those who receive care on a more irregular basis. If the health care services available for those with arthritis or rheumatism are not being used, particularly if a specific group of people (such as women) are not being reached, the effects of this disease may be far more debilitating than is necessary and greatly decrease quality of life. There are also issues surrounding the availability of specialized health care services, such as TJR surgery and the services of rheumatologists, in some of the more rural regions of Canada. Research is currently being conducted on regional variation in service availability, although the findings were not available for inclusion in this report.
The burden of arthritis in women also has considerable societal costs. A high proportion of women with arthritis reported not being in the labour force. This finding has been reported in other studies as well, many of which have also noted that simple and non-costly adaptations, such as flexible work schedules, may enable many people to remain in, or return to, the workplace [29–31]. As well, women often have roles as homemakers and caregivers that may be affected by arthritis disability. Since most disability and employment studies focus only on paid work, relatively little is known about the effect of arthritis on domestic responsibilities.
Gaps and Recommendations
A number of gaps exist in the arthritis and gender data that are currently available. A major gap is the lack of detailed data on the use of health care services by women with arthritis. Most of the care for arthritis, including specialist care, is delivered in ambulatory settings on which there are currently no systematic data available, although, in principle, such data could be captured by a provincial database of physician billing claims. Data are available on surgery and hospitalization, but only a minority of women with arthritis undergo these interventions. There are no systematic data available on the prescribing of medications, the use of rehabilitation services, such as physical and occupational therapy, or access to other services, such as assistive devices, therapeutic exercise programs, community support and self-management. The need for data on the use of prescription medication is of increasing importance in light of current advances in the development of stomach-sparing anti-inflammatory drugs (e.g. COX-2 inhibitors) and effective, but expensive, drugs for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. People with arthritis are also major users of alternative health care services and herbal medications. This is a further area in which there is a deficit of reliable information about efficacy and use.
Our only sources of comprehensive population-based data are national and provincial health surveys. These surveys rely on self-reported information regarding socio-demographic characteristics, medical conditions and health status, although there are questions surrounding the validity of this method. Another issue with these surveys is that they do not enable us to differentiate between the many types of arthritis, such as osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. This is important, since patients with rheumatoid arthritis tend to report more frequent and intense pain than patients with osteoarthritis, and the proportion of individuals with rheumatoid arthritis who are women is higher than the proportion with osteoarthritis. Also, data from these surveys do not allow health status or health utilization to be attributed to a specific disease. Therefore, even if an individual reports the presence of both arthritis and long-term disability, it cannot be ascertained whether the long-term disability is a direct result of the arthritis.
Information about the impact of arthritis on women and their associated use of health care services is vital to underpin a strategy aimed at reducing the impact of this disease. Such a strategy would require that health and support services be available in a timely manner and provided in such a way as to meet the needs of women. Any such strategy would need to address access to primary care physicians and specialist services. There are perceived deficiencies in the primary care management of arthritis, and areas of concern include timely referral to specialists, advice to patients about exercise and other non-pharmacological interventions, and the examination of joints [33–36]. We lack information about the use of medical specialists, particularly rheumatologists, by women with arthritis. More information is clearly needed about the factors associated with use of care by women for their arthritis.
The disability associated with arthritis often leads to reduced independence, to lower participation in employment, social and leisure activities, and to loss of income and the incurring of extra expenses. Rehabilitation therapy and community support services need to be in place to help individuals deal with the disabilities and associated costs arising from arthritis. These services represent a vast but largely uncharted territory. There are few data about them and, in the case of community services, very little documentation about what services are available and how they are used. There is evidence that the use of education and self-management strategies can lead to significant decreases in pain, disability and medical consultation as well as increases in self-efficacy [37–39]. As well, this type of "self-managed" intervention appears to be more frequently used by women than men. This points to the need for further research and more investment in community-based interventions that may facilitate the day-to-day management of arthritis by women.
The burden of arthritis both on women and on society is expected to increase with the aging of the population. Because of the current age structure of the Canadian population and the aging of the "baby boomer" generation (those born between 1946 and 1960), a large increase is expected in the number of people over the age of 65 and a subsequent increase of approximately 1 million per decade over the next 30 years in the number of people with arthritis or rheumatism. Sixty per cent of this increase in prevalence will occur among women. These statistics alone point to the need for a comprehensive health strategy to reduce the impact of arthritis. Major efforts are also needed to find ways of capturing information on the use of ambulatory care, specialists, medications, rehabilitation and other services by both women and men with arthritis.
Arthritis is one of the most frequent chronic conditions in women in Canada, and the health care and support systems aimed at dealing with the impact of arthritis need to be geared to the provision of care over a longer period of time, the ultimate goal of care being to improve the situation of women with arthritis and their families. It is hoped that this report will contribute to putting arthritis on the agenda of women's health.
- Badley EM, Rasooly I, Webster GK: Relative importance of musculoskeletal disorders as a cause of chronic health problems, disability, and health care utilization: findings from the 1990 Ontario Health Survey. J Rheumatol. 1994, 21 (3): 505-514.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Badley EM, Webster G, Rasooly I: The impact of musculoskeletal disorders in the population: Are they just aches and pains? Findings from the 1990 Ontario Health Survey. J Rheumatol. 1995, 22 (4): 733-739.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Holm MB, Rogers JC, Kwoh CK: Predictors of functional disability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res. 1998, 11 (5): 346-355. 10.1002/art.1790110506.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guillemin F: Functional disability and quality-of-life assessment in clinical practice. Rheumatology. 2000, 39 (Supplement 1): 17-23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Badley EM: The impact of disabling arthritis. Arthritis Care Res. 1995, 8 (4): 221-228. 10.1002/art.1790080405.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Verbrugge LM: Women, men, and osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res. 1995, 8 (4): 212-220. 10.1002/art.1790080404.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Badley EM, Gignac MAM, Rothman LM, Sutton D: The impact of arthritis on the women of Ontario; supplementary figures and tables for men. ACREU Working Report Series No. 99-5. Toronto: Arthritis Community Research & Evaluation Unit (ACREU). 1999Google Scholar
- Castaneda DM, Bigatti S, Cronan TA: Gender and exercise behavior among women and men with osteoarthritis. Women Health. 1998, 27 (4): 33-53. 10.1300/J013v27n04_03.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Katz PP, Criswell LA: Differences in symptom reports between men and women with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res. 1996, 9 (6): 441-448. 10.1002/art.1790090605.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Verbrugge LM, Patrick DL: Seven chronic conditions: their impact on US adults' activity levels and use of medical services. Am J Public Health. 1995, 85 (2): 173-182.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences. Patterns of health care in Ontario: arthritis and related conditions. Toronto. 1998Google Scholar
- Hopman-Rock M, de Bock GH, Bijlsma JW, et al: The pattern of health care utilization of elderly people with arthritis pain in the hip or knee. Int J Qual Health Care. 1997, 9 (2): 129-137. 10.1016/S1353-4505(97)00106-3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bankhead C, Silman A, Barrett B, et al: Incidence of rheumatoid arthritis is not related to indicators of socioeconomic deprivation. J Rheumatol. 1996, 23 (12): 2039-2042.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang PP, Elsbett-Koeppen R, Geng G, Badley EM: Arthritis prevalence and place of birth: findings from the 1994 Canadian National Population Health Survey. Am J Epidemiol. 2000, 152 (5): 442-445. 10.1093/aje/152.5.442.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dunlop DD, Manheim LM, Song J, Chang RW: Arthritis prevalence and activity limitations in older adults. Arthritis Rheum. 2001, 44 (1): 212-221. 10.1002/1529-0131(200101)44:1<212::AID-ANR28>3.0.CO;2-Q.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sangha O: Epidemiology of rheumatic diseases. Rheumatology. 2000, 39 (S2): 3-12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Saraux A, Guedes C, Allain J, Devauchelle V, Valls I, Lamour A, Guillemin F, Youinou P, Le Goff P: Prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthropathy in Brittany, France. Societé de Rhumatologie de l'Ouest. J Rheumatol. 1999, 26 (12): 2622-2627.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cimmino MA, Parisi M, Moggiana G, Mela GS, Accardo S: Prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis in Italy: the Chiavari Study. Ann Rheum Dis. 1998, 57 (5): 315-318.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Riise T, Jacobsen BK, Gran JT: Incidence and prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis in the county of Troms, northern Norway. J Rheumatol. 2000, 27 (6): 1386-1389.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Carmona L, Villaverde V, Hernandez-Garcia C, Ballina J, Gabriel R, Laffon A: The prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis in the general population of Spain. Rheumatology. 2002, 41 (1): 88-95. 10.1093/rheumatology/41.1.88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Simonsson M, Bergman S, Jacobsson LT, Petersson IF, Svensson B: The prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis in Sweden. Scand J Rheumatol. 1999, 28 (6): 340-343. 10.1080/03009749950155319.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stojanovic R, Glajinac H, Palic-Obradovic D, Janosevic S, Adanja B: Prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis in Belgrade, Jugoslavia. Br J Rheumatol. 1998, 37 (7): 729-732. 10.1093/rheumatology/37.7.729.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brady OW, Masri BA, Garbuz DS, Duncan CP: Rheumatology: 10. Joint replacement of the hip and knee – when to refer and what to expect. Can Med Assoc J. 2000, 163 (10): 1285-1291.Google Scholar
- Canadian Institute for Health Information: Total hip and total knee replacements in Canada: Canadian Joint Replacement Registry 2002 Report. Ottawa: CIHI. 2002Google Scholar
- Hawker GA, Wright JG, Coyte PC, Williams JI, Harvey B, Glazier R, Wilkins A, Badley EM: Determining the need for hip and knee arthroplasty: the role of clinical severity and patients' preferences. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000, 53 (12): 1200-1208. 10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00244-4.Google Scholar
- March LM, Stenmark J: Non-pharmacological approaches to managing arthritis. Med J Aust. 2001, 175 (Suppl): S102-7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hawker GA, Wright JG, Coyte PC, Williams JI, Harvey B, Glazier R, Badley EM: Differences between men and women in the rate of use of hip and knee arthroplasty. N Engl J Med. 2000, 342 (14): 1016-1022. 10.1056/NEJM200004063421405.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ward MM: Rheumatology visit frequency and changes in functional disability and pain in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 1997, 24 (1): 35-42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yelin E, Sonneborn D, Trupin L: The prevalence and impact of accommodations on the employment of persons 51–61 years of age with musculoskeletal conditions. Arthritis Rheum. 2000, 13 (3): 168-176. 10.1002/1529-0131(200006)13:3<168::AID-ANR6>3.0.CO;2-R.Google Scholar
- DeRoos AJ, Callahan LF: Differences by sex in correlates of work status in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Arthritis Care Res. 1999, 12 (6): 381-391. 10.1002/1529-0131(199912)12:6<381::AID-ART6>3.0.CO;2-G.Google Scholar
- Badley EM, Rothman LM, Elsbett-Koeppen RH, Wang PP: Employment and arthritis in the working age population. ACREU Working Report Series No 99-3. Toronto: Arthritis Community Research and Evaluation Unit. 1999Google Scholar
- Affleck G, Tennen H, Keefe FJ, et al: Everyday life with osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis: independent effects of disease and gender on daily pain, mood, and coping. Pain. 1999, 83: 601-609. 10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00167-0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Glazier RH, Dalby DM, Badley EM, Hawker GA, Bell MJ, Buchbinder R, Lineker SC: Management of common musculoskeletal problems: a survey of Ontario primary care physicians. Can Med Assoc J. 1998, 158 (8): 1037-1040.Google Scholar
- Glazier RH, Dalby DM, Badley EM, Hawker GA, Bell MJ, Buchbinder R: Determinants of physician confidence in the primary care management of musculoskeletal disorders. J Rheumatol. 1996, 23 (2): 351-356.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bolumar F, Ruiz MT, Hernandez I, Pascual E: Reliability of the diagnosis of rheumatic conditions at the primary health care level. J Rheumatol. 1994, 21 (12): 2344-2348.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gamez-Nava JI, Gonzalez-Lopez L, Davis P, Suarez-Almazor ME: Referral and diagnosis of common rheumatic diseases by primary care physicians. Br J Rheumatol. 1998, 37: 1215-1219. 10.1093/rheumatology/37.11.1215.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Edworthy SM: How important is patient self-management?. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2000, 14 (4): 705-714. 10.1053/berh.2000.0108.Google Scholar
- Lorig K, Gonzalez VM, Laurent DD, Morgan L, Laris BA: Arthritis self-management program variations: three studies. Arthritis Care Res. 1998, 11 (6): 448-454. 10.1002/art.1790110604.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barlow JH, Turner AP, Wright CC: Long-term outcomes of an arthritis self-management programme. Br J Rheumatol. 1998, 37 (12): 1315-1319. 10.1093/rheumatology/37.12.1315.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Musil CM: Gender differences in health and health actions among community-dwelling elders. J Gerontol Nurs. 1998, 24 (2): 30-38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.