Volume 4 Supplement 1

Women's Health Surveillance Report

Open Access

Gender Differences in Bacterial STIs in Canada

  • Thomas Wong1Email author,
  • Ameeta Singh2,
  • Janice Mann3,
  • Lisa Hansen4 and
  • Sharon McMahon5
BMC Women's Health20044(Suppl 1):S26

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6874-4-S1-S26

Published: 25 August 2004

Abstract

Health Issue

The incidence of bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs) is rising in Canada. If these curable infections were prevented and treated, serious long-term sequelae including infertility, and associated treatment costs, could be dramatically reduced. STIs pose a greater risk to women than men in many ways, and further gender differences exist in screening and diagnosis.

Key Findings

Reported incidence rates of chlamydia, gonorrhea, and infectious syphilis declined until 1997, when the trend began to reverse. The reported rate of chlamydia is much higher among women than men, whereas the reverse is true for gonorrhea and infectious syphilis. Increases in high-risk sexual behaviour among men who have sex with men were observed after the introduction of potent HIV suppressive therapy in 1996, but behavioural changes in women await further research.

Data Gaps and Recommendations

STI surveillance in Canada needs improvement. Reported rates underestimate the true incidence. Gender-specific behavioural changes must be monitored to enhance responsiveness to groups at highest risk, and more research is needed on effective strategies to promote safer sexual practices. Geographic and ethnic disparities, gaps, and needs must be addressed. Urine screening for chlamydia should be more widely available for women as well as men, particularly among high-risk men in order to prevent re-infections in their partners. As women are more likely to present for health examinations (e.g. Pap tests), these screening opportunities must be utilized. Female-controlled methods of STI prevention, such as safer topical microbicides, are urgently needed.

Background

The incidence of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), such as chlamydia, gonorrhea and syphilis, is rising in Canada, with serious health and economic consequences. Women are at greater risk of STIs than men in a number of ways, including their susceptibility to infection and the severity of the sequelae associated with infection. A further difference between men and women lies in the difficulties involved in screening and diagnosis. This chapter discusses these differences and presents surveillance data on the incidence of chlamydia, gonorrhea and syphilis.

STI Susceptibility and Transmission

A female in early adolescence is at increased risk of STIs, because her cervical os still comprises an exposed squamocolumnar junction, which during puberty is gradually replaced by squamous tissue[1]. Squamous cells are resistant to chlamydia and gonorrhea, whereas columnar epithelium supports their growth. As well, in early adolescence the cervical mucus, which is normally protective, is more easily penetrated by these organisms[2]. Oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) increase vulnerability to STIs in females of any age by enlarging the size of this squamocolumnar junction [36]. but may. protect against pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), a serious consequence of STIs [69].

Little is known about biological susceptibility factors in males, except that circumcision reduces the risk of STIs, including infection with human papillomavirus (HPV) [1019]. Circumcision in men at high risk of HPV also reduces the risk of cervical cancer in their female partners[20].

Many STIs are transmitted more efficiently from males to females. For example, the risk of genital herpes transmission from a male to female partner is 19%, whereas it is 5% for transmission from female to male[21]. After a single episode of sexual intercourse, a woman has a 60% to 90% chance of contracting gonorrhea from her infected male partner, whereas the risk for a man from a woman is 20% to 30%[22, 23]. The reasons for this difference may include greater exposure in females as a result of pooled semen in the vagina and greater trauma to tissues during intercourse.

Sequelae

Once infected, women face a disproportionate burden of sequelae from STIs. These include PID, chronic pelvic pain, ectopic pregnancy, infertility and cervical cancers. After one episode of PID, 20% of females will suffer chronic pelvic pain, 9% an ectopic pregnancy and 8% infertility; the risk of infertility doubles after each subsequent episode[24]. PID is the cause of 15% of all infertility. In men, infertility is only a very rare complication of STIs. Although HPV rarely causes penile and anal cancers in males, females may develop the much more common cervical as well as vaginal and anal cancers[25]. If a pregnant woman is infected, the STI can be transmitted to her newborn, and may result in miscarriage, premature labour, stillbirth, mental retardation and infant death[26].

Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment

For gonorrhea, up to 80% of females can be asymptomatic, as compared with about 10% to 20% of men[27]. Thus, females are more likely than males to harbour this infection, and it is likely to remain undiagnosed. Although 80% of women with chlamydia remain asymptomatic, half of men with chlamydia have symptoms[28, 29]. Screening is critical to reducing the size of this hidden epidemic. Indeed, a randomized controlled trial of chlamydia screening demonstrated a reduction in the incidence of PID[30].

Clinical diagnosis of STIs in females is not as reliable as in males because invasive pelvic examinations are required and because vaginal discharge may be due to non-sexually transmitted diseases. As well, laboratory detection of an STI in genital specimens from women is more difficult: the sensitivity and specificity of the tests used may be affected by the presence of blood, mucus or organisms normally present in the body[31].

Males may be less likely to attend for screening, as collecting a urethral swab might be a deterrent. STI recurrences in females have been associated with an infected male partner who either keeps the infection secret or whose condition remains undiagnosed and untreated. Chlamydia screening programs have traditionally targeted only females. Ironically, if active screening of the infection in men were increased this would benefit women by reducing their reinfection rate and sending the message that men must take responsibility for sexual and reproductive matters. The recent introduction of non-invasive urine-based nucleic acid diagnostic tests, which may be carried out in or outside the health care setting, has overcome certain diagnostic challenges in both males and females [3238], and these tests may prove less of a deterrent to screening in men.

As settings of both prevention and treatment, STD clinics have been less sensitive to the needs of women, whereas family planning programs have focused less on the needs of men[39]. Men are more likely than women to be screened for syphilis when an STI is suspected[40]. Women are more likely to treat themselves, using over-the-counter vaginal yeast medications, douches, etc., which can mask an actual STI and delay diagnosis[39, 41].

Methods

Chlamydia, gonorrhea and syphilis infections are nationally notifiable bacterial STIs in Canada. All 13 provinces and territories provide Health Canada with non-nominal surveillance data consisting of at least age or age group, sex, and province or territory of residence.

Surveillance data submitted to Health Canada from 1991 to 2000 (From 1993 infectious syphilis (primary, secondary and early latent syphilis) was introduced to replace early symptomatic syphilis; chlamydia data were reported only from 1992 by some jurisdictions were analyzed. The data for 2000 are preliminary, and changes for this year are anticipated because of reporting delays. Annual incidence rates per 100,000 population were calculated using census population estimates and intercensus estimates from Statistics Canada. The chi-square test was used for comparison of proportions, and the chi-square test for trends was used to compare proportion trends. A two-sided p value of less than 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

Results

Chlamydia (Figures 1 and 2)

Figure 1

Reported Chlamydia Rate per 100,000 Population in Canada, 1997–2000 Source: Sexual Health and Sexually Transmitted Infections, Centre for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Health Canada, 2001

Figure 2

Reported Chlamydia Rates in Canada Source: Sexual Health and Sexually Transmitted Infections, Centre for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Health Canada, 2001

Females accounted for over two thirds of the 46,000 chlamydia cases reported in Canada, at a rate of 211.8 per 100,000 versus 89.1 per 100,000 among men in the year 2000 (p < 0.001). The chlamydia rate had been on the decline until 1997, when this downward trend started to revert (Figure 1). Since then, the rate has increased significantly among both males (p < 0.001) and females (p < 0.001), with a greater increase in males (53.4% versus 27.4%, p <0.001). The highest incidence and fastest rate of increase has been in the 15 to 24 age group among females but in the 20s age group among males.

Gonorrhea (Figures 3 and 4)

Figure 3

Reported Gonorrhea Rate per 100,000 Population in Canada, 1997 to 2000. Source: Sexual Health and Sexually Transmitted Infections, Centre for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Health Canada, 2001

Figure 4

Reported Gonorrhea Rates in Canada Source: Sexual Health and Sexually Transmitted Infections, Centre for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Health Canada, 2001

Males accounted for almost two thirds of the 6,000 nationally reported cases of gonorrhea in the year 2000, at a rate of 25.3 per 100,000 versus 15.3 per 100,000 among females (p < 0.001). The gonorrhea rate had been on the decline until 1997, when it began to increase again (Figure 2). Since then, the rate has increased significantly among both males (p < 0.001) and females (p = 0.02), but with a greater increase among males (42.9% versus 31.9%, p = 0.002). Among females, the peak incidence and the fastest rate of increase have taken place in the 15 to 24 age group. The highest reported incidence among males has been in the 20 to 29 age group and the fastest rate of increase in the 20s and 30s age groups.

Syphilis (Figures 5 and 6)

Figure 5

Reported Infectious Syphilis Rate per 100,000 Population in Canada, 1997 to 2000 Source: Sexual Health and Sexually Transmitted Infections, Centre for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Health Canada, 2001

Figure 6

Reported Infectious Syphlis Rates in Canada Source: Sexual Health and Sexually Transmitted Infections, Centre for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Health Canada, 2001

Males made up almost two thirds of the 171 cases of infectious syphilis reported nationally in the year 2000, at a rate of 0.73 per 100,000 versus 0.39 per 100,000 among females (p < 0.001). The infectious syphilis rate had been on the decline until 1997, when this downward trend started to revert (Figure 3). Since then, the rate has increased significantly among males, by 62.2% (p < 0.001), but not among females (p = 0.3). The peak incidence among females occurred in 15 to 39 year olds and the fastest rate of increase in the 15 to 24 age group. The highest incidence and fastest increase among males have occurred in the 25 to 29 age group.

Discussion

STI

Since 1996, molecular diagnostic testing for chlamydia has become increasingly available across Canada. These tests have the advantage of being non-invasive and more sensitive than the older methodologies used for the diagnosis of chlamydia. In addition, the increasing availability of urine-based tests has made testing for chlamydia more acceptable for both men and women. This, along with recent improvements in chlamydia screening initiatives, may have contributed to the observed increase in reported chlamydia incidence.

Since the introduction of these tests, there has been a consistent upswing in reported rates not only of chlamydia but also of gonorrhea and syphilis, despite the lack of widespread screening and diagnostic advances for these latter infections in Canada. In the absence of improvement in disease reporting, this is strongly suggestive of real increases in the occurrence of these STIs in recent years.

Sexual Behaviours

Although STI rates had been declining since the beginning of the HIV epidemic – possibly as a result of prevention and screening programs, changes in sexual behaviour in response to the HIV epidemic, and the availability of single-dose treatment for some STIs[42, 43] – the decline. was reversed in 1997. Increases in high-risk sexual behaviour in men who have sex with men were reported after the introduction of potent, antiretroviral HIV suppressive therapy [4447], but behavioural changes in women await further research.

Girls and boys are socialized into different gender roles, affected by culture, peer and parental influences. Males tend to have an earlier sexual debut and a higher rate of partner changes[39, 48]. Females are more likely than males to have been forced into their first sexual encounter[49]. Men have more control than women over condom use. Women are uncomfortable about insisting on condom use for fear of the reactions of their male partners regarding trust and commitment issues[50, 51]. The power differential and potential for domestic violence create barriers that may prevent women from protecting themselves[52]. Therefore, prevention programs for women need to target safer sex negotiation skills and female-controlled methods[53, 54].

Prevention

In a U.S. survey of 1,000 females, only 11% were aware of the fact that STIs are more harmful to females than to males; those with less knowledge were less likely to practise safer sex[39]. Preventive information is necessary for behaviour to change, but it is not sufficient. Most prevention programs have been proven to fail. Issues specific to gender and culture must be incorporated. Women benefit from prevention strategies that address gender roles, the power differential between the sexes, financial dependence on men, fulfillment in their intimate relationships, and bonding with other women [5557]. Two randomized controlled trials incorporating these elements showed a significant reduction in rates of STIs[58, 59].

Economic Burden

In 1990, the estimated direct and indirect costs of chlamydia in Canadian females, including diagnosis, treatment and productivity loss, were as high as $115 million (Canadian) dollars; for males the cost was as high as $8 million. In the same year, the cost burden of gonorrhea was up to $63 million for females and $12 million for males[60]. If properly prevented and treated, the cost savings would be enormous for these easily curable illnesses.

Data Limitations

The reported rate for any disease may underestimate the true incidence if a lack of symptoms causes people not to present themselves for diagnosis. Up to 80% of women with gonorrhea or chlamydia can be asymptomatic, and discharge and genital lesions are harder to detect and diagnose in women. In general, men do not go for screening or medical examination as regularly as women and, even if they do, clinicians may not screen them for STIs if they are asymptomatic. Therefore, undiagnosed chlamydia in men may contribute in part to the significantly lower reported rate among men. Thus the reported rates are a fraction of the true disease burden, and they are influenced by the amount of screening.

Policy Implications and Recommendations

The highest public health priority is to reduce this hidden epidemic in youth, the group burdened with the highest infection rate. Young women are more susceptible to STIs than young men, and more likely to have hidden infections, resulting in longer diagnostic and treatment delays and the development of long-term sequelae. Health professionals should be encouraged to provide prevention and care services that are evidence-based, gender-specific and culturally sensitive. To reduce the health and economic consequences of the increasing rates of STIs, action must be taken in the following areas.

Surveillance

• Strengthen the STI surveillance system across Canada, especially in high-risk subpopulations.

• Assess gender, ethnic (e.g. Aboriginal people) and geographic disparities (e.g. rural versus urban).

Research

• Evaluate gender-specific behavioural changes leading to increased STI rates.

• Evaluate safer, acceptable and female-controlled methods of STI prevention, such as topical microbicides, that do not increase the risk of HIV transmission[61].

• Evaluate gender-specific strategies that promote safer sexual practices and behaviour change, such as the use of the Internet for STI/HIV "cyberprevention."

Prevention

• Develop gender-specific strategies that address biological, socio-demographic, access, prevention, screening and behavioural issues[62].

• Increase availability of urine screening for chlamydia.

• Improve urine screening test performance for gonorrhea.

• Increase prevention efforts targeting the high disease burden of chlamydia, particularly through screening of youth and disenfranchised populations as well as of women and men at high risk.

• Increase opportunities for screening by taking advantage of women's greater tendency to present for health examinations (e.g. Pap tests).

• Adopt creative approaches to screening in men, in order to prevent reinfection in their female partners.

Note

The views expressed in this report do not necessarily represent the views of the Canadian Population Health Initiative, the Canadian Institute for Health Information or Health Canada.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Centre for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Health Canada
(2)
Infections Diseases Medical Consultant STD, Alberta Health and Wellness
(3)
Centre for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Health Canada
(4)
Centre for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Health Canada
(5)
Centre for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Health Canada

References

  1. Holmes KK, Stamm WE: Lower genital tract infection in females: urethro, cervical, and vaginal infections. In: Sexually transmitted diseases. Edited by: Holmes KK, Sparling PF, Mardh P-A, Lemon SM, Stamm WE, Piot P. 1999, New York: McGraw-Hill, 761-782.Google Scholar
  2. Vickery BH, Bennett JP: The cervix and its secretion in mammals. Physiol Rev. 1968, 48 (1): 135-154.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Harrison HR, Costin M, Meder JB, Bownds LM, Sim DA, Lewis M, et al: Cervical Chlamydia trachomatis infection in university women: relationship to history, contraception, ectopy, and cervicitis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985, 153 (3): 244-251.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Washington AE, Gove S, Schachter J, Sweet RL: Oral contraceptives, Chlamydia trachomatis infection, and pelvic inflammatory disease: a word of caution about protection. JAMA. 1985, 253 (15): 2246-2250. 10.1001/jama.253.15.2246.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Park BJ, Stergachis A, Scholes D, Heidrich FE, Holmes KK, Stamm WE: Contraceptive methods and the risk of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in young women. Am J Epidemiol. 1995, 142 (7): 771-778.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Critchlow CW, Wolner-Hanssen P, Eschenbach DA, Kiviat NB, Koutsky LA, Stevens CE, et al: Determinants of cervical ectopia and of cervicitis: age, oral contraception, specific cervical infection, smoking, and douching. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995, 173 (2): 534-543. 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90279-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Rubin GL, Ory HW, Layde PM: Oral contraceptives and pelvic inflammatory disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982, 144 (6): 630-635.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Panser LA, Phipps WR: Type of oral contraceptive in relation to acute, initial episodes of pelvic inflammatory disease. Contraception. 1991, 43 (1): 91-99. 10.1016/0010-7824(91)90130-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Svensson L, Westrom L, Mardh PA: Contraceptives and acute salpingitis. JAMA. 1984, 251 (19): 2553-2555. 10.1001/jama.251.19.2553.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Szabo R, Short RV: How does male circumcision protect against HIV infection?. BMJ. 2000, 320 (7249): 1592-1594. 10.1136/bmj.320.7249.1592.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hussain LA, Lehner T: Comparative investigation of Langerhans' cells and potential receptors for HIV in oral, genitourinary and rectal epithelia. Immunology. 1995, 85 (3): 475-484.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Tyndall MW, Ronald AR, Agoki E, Malisa W, Bwayo JJ, Ndinya-Achola JO, et al: Increased risk of infection with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 among uncircumcised men presenting with genital ulcer disease in Kenya. Clin Infect Dis. 1996, 23 (3): 449-453.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cook LS, Koutsky LA, Holmes KK: Circumcision and sexually transmitted diseases. Am J Public Health. 1994, 84 (2): 197-201.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kreiss JK, Hopkins SG: The association between circumcision status and human immunodeficiency virus infection among homosexual men. J Infect Dis. 1993, 168 (6): 1404-1408.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Moses S, Bailey RC, Ronald AR: Male circumcision: assessment of health benefits and risks. Sex Transm Infect. 1998, 74 (5): 368-373.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Moses S, Plummer FA, Bradley JE, Ndinya-Achola JO, Nagelkerke NJ, Ronald AR: The association between lack of male circumcision and risk for HIV infection: a review of the epidemiological data. Sex Transm Dis. 1994, 21 (4): 201-210.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Gray RH, Kiwanuka N, Quinn TC, Sewankambo NK, Serwadda D, Mangen FW, et al: Male circumcision and HIV acquisition and transmission: cohort studies in Rakai, Uganda. Rakai Project Team. AIDS. 2000, 14 (15): 2371-2381. 10.1097/00002030-200010200-00019.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lavreys L, Rakwar JP, Thompson ML, Jackson DJ, Mandaliya K, Chohan BH, et al: Effect of circumcision on incidence of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and other sexually transmitted diseases: a prospective cohort study of trucking company employees in Kenya. J Infect Dis. 1999, 180 (2): 330-336. 10.1086/314884.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Cameron DW, Simonsen JN, D'Costa LJ, Ronald AR, Maitha GM, Gakinya MN, et al: Female to male transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1: risk factors for seroconversion in men. Lancet. 1989, 2 (8660): 403-407. 10.1016/S0140-6736(89)90589-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Castellsague X, Bosch FX, Munoz N, Meijer CJLM, Shah KV, de Sanjose S, et al: Male circumcision, penile human papillomavirus infection, and cervical cancer in female partners. N Engl J Med. 2002, 346 (15): 1105-1112. 10.1056/NEJMoa011688.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Mertz GJ, Benedetti J, Ashley R, Selke SA, Corey L: Risk factors for the sexual transmission of genital herpes. Ann Intern Med. 1992, 116: 197-202.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hooper RR, Reynolds GH, Jones OG, Zaidi A, Wiesner PJ, Latimer KP, et al: Cohort study of venereal disease. I: The risk of gonorrhea transmission from infected women to men. Am J Epidemiol. 1978, 108 (2): 136-144.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Platt R, Rice PA, McCormack WM: Risk of acquiring gonorrhea and prevalence of abnormal adnexal findings among women recently exposed to gonorrhea. JAMA. 1983, 250 (23): 3205-3209. 10.1001/jama.250.23.3205.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Westrom L, Joesoef R, Reynolds G, Hagdu A, Thompson SE: Pelvic inflammatory disease and fertility: a cohort study of 1,844 women with laparoscopically verified disease and 657 control women with normal laparoscopic results. Sex Transm Dis. 1992, 19 (4): 185-192.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Zur Hausen H: Papillomaviruses and cancer: from basic studies to clinical application. Nature Rev Cancer. 2002, 2: 342-350. 10.1038/nrc798.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Brocklehurst P: Update on the treatment of sexually transmitted infections in pregnancy. Int J STD AIDS. 1999, 10: 571-580. 10.1258/0956462991914690.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Judson FN: Gonorrhea. Med Clin North Am. 1990, 74: 1353-1367.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Fish AN, Fairweather DV, Oriel JD, Ridgway GL: Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a gynaecology clinic population: identification of high-risk groups and the value of contact tracing. Eur J Obstet Gyanecol Reprod Biol. 1989, 31 (1): 67-74. 10.1016/0028-2243(89)90027-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Zimmerman HL, Potterat JJ, Dukes RL, Muth JB, Zimmerman HP, Fogle JS, et al: Epidemiologic differences between chlamydia and gonorrhea. Am J Public Health. 1990, 80 (11): 1338-1342.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Scholes D, Stergachis A, Heidrich FE, Andrilla H, Holmes KK, Stamm WE: Prevention of pelvic inflammatory disease by screening for cervical chlamydial infection. N Engl J Med. 1996, 334 (21): 1362-1366. 10.1056/NEJM199605233342103.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Black CM: Current methods of laboratory diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1997, 10: 16-84.Google Scholar
  32. Bauwens JE, Clark AM, Stamm WE: Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis endocervical infections by a commercial polymerase chain reaction assay. J Clin Microbiol. 1993, 31 (11): 3023-3027.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Chernesky MA, Jang D, Lee H, Burczak JD, Hu H, Sellors J, et al: Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in men and women by testing first-void urine by ligase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol. 1994, 32 (11): 2682-2685.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Bauwens JE, Clark AM, Loeffelholz MJ, Herman SA, Stamm WE: Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis urethritis in men by polymerase chain reaction assay of first-catch urine. J Clin Microbiol. 1993, 31 (11): 3013-3016.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Mahony JB, Luinstra KE, Sellors JW, Jang D, Chernesky MA: Confirmatory polymerase chain reaction testing for Chlamydia trachomatis in first-void urine from asymptomatic and symptomatic men. J Clin Microbiol. 1992, 30 (9): 2241-2245.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Toye B, Peeling RW, Jessamine P, Claman P, Gemmill I: Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in asymptomatic men and women by PCR assay. J Clin Microbiol. 1996, 34 (6): 1396-1400.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Quinn TC, Welsh L, Lentz A, Crotchfelt K, Zenilman J, Newhall J, et al: Diagnosis by AMPLICOR PCR of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in urine samples from women and men attending sexually transmitted disease clinics. J Clin Microbiol. 1996, 34 (6): 1401-1406.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Sugunendran H, Birley HD, Mallinson H, Abbott M, Tong CY: Comparison of urine, first and second endourethral swabs for PCR based detection of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in male patients. Sex Transm Infect. 2001, 77 (6): 423-426. 10.1136/sti.77.6.423.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Institute of Medicine. The hidden epidemic: confronting sexually transmitted diseases. 1997, Washington DC: National Academy Press
  40. Garfinkel M, Blumstein H: Gender differences in testing for syphilis in emergency department patients diagnosed with sexually transmitted diseases. J Emerg Med. 1999, 17 (6): 937-940. 10.1016/S0736-4679(99)00118-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Fonck K, Mwai C, Ndinya-Achola J, Bwayo J, Temmerman M: Health-seeking and sexual behaviors among primary healthcare patients in Nairobi, Kenya. Sex Transm Dis. 2002, 29 (2): 106-111. 10.1097/00007435-200202000-00007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Health Canada: Sexually transmitted diseases surveillance in Canada. 1998/1999 annual report. CCDR. 2000, 26 (S6): 19-22.Google Scholar
  43. Patrick DM, Wong T, Jordan R: Sexually transmitted infections in Canada: recent resurgence threatens national goals. Can J Human Sexuality. 2000, 9 (2): 149-165.Google Scholar
  44. Misovich SJ, Fisher JD, Fisher WA: Belief in a cure for HIV infection associated with greater HIV risk behaviour among HIV positive men who have sex with men. Can J Human Sexuality. 1999, 8 (4): 241-248.Google Scholar
  45. Strathdee SA, Martindale SL, Cornelisse PG, Miller ML, Craib KJ, Schechter MT, et al: HIV infection and risk behaviours among young gay and bisexual men in Vancouver. Can Med Assoc J. 2000, 162 (1): 21-25.Google Scholar
  46. Stall RD, Hays RB, Waldo CR, Ekstrand M, McFarland : The Gay '90s: a review of research in the 1990s on sexual behavior and HIV risk among men who have sex with men. AIDS. 2000, 14 (Suppl 3): S101-S114.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Ekstrand ML, Stall RD, Paul JP, Osmond DH, Coates TJ: Gay men report high rates of unprotected anal sex with partners of unknown or discordant HIV status. AIDS. 1999, 3 (12): 1525-153. 10.1097/00002030-199908200-00013.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Siegel DM, Klein DI, Roghmann KJ: Sexual behavior, contraception, and risk among college students. J Adolesc Health. 1999, 25 (5): 336-343. 10.1016/S1054-139X(99)00054-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. HHS: Fertility, family planning and women's health: new data from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth. PHS97. United States DHHS. Series 23: Data from the National Survey of Family Growth. 1995, 19:Google Scholar
  50. Stein ZA: HIV prevention: the need for methods women can use. Am J Public Health. 1990, 80 (4): 460-462.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Marin BV, Gomez CA, Tschann JM: Condom use among Hispanic men with secondary female sexual partners. Public Health Rep. 1993, 108 (6): 742-750.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Plichta SB, Abraham C: Violence and gynecologic health in women <50 years old. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996, 174 (3): 903-907. 10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70323-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Elias CJ, Heise LL: Challenges for the development of female-controlled vaginal microbicides. AIDS. 1994, 8 (1): 1-9. 10.1097/00002030-199401000-00002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Rosenberg MJ, Gollub EL: Commentary: methods women can use that may prevent sexually transmitted disease, including HIV. Am J Public Health. 1992, 82 (11): 1473-1478.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Amaro H: Love, sex, and power. Considering women's realities in HIV prevention. Am Psychol. 1995, 50 (6): 437-447. 10.1037//0003-066X.50.6.437.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Worth D: Sexual decision-making and AIDS: why condom promotion among vulnerable women is likely to fail. Stud Fam Plann. 1989, 20 (6 Pt 1): 297-307. 10.2307/1966433.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Weeks MR, Schensul JJ, Williams SS, Singer M, Grier M: AIDS prevention for African-American and Latina women: building culturally and gender-appropriate intervention. AIDS Educ Prev. 1995, 7 (3): 251-264.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Kamb ML, Fishbein M, Douglas JMJ, Rhodes F, Rogers J, Bolan G, et al: Efficacy of risk-reduction counseling to prevent human immunodeficiency virus and sexually transmitted diseases: a randomized controlled trial. Project RESPECT Study Group. JAMA. 1998, 280 (13): 1161-1167. 10.1001/jama.280.13.1161.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Shain RN, Piper JM, Newton ER, Perdue ST, Ramos R, Champion JD, et al: A randomized controlled trial of a behavioral intervention to prevent sexually transmitted disease among minority women. N Engl J Med. 1999, 340 (2): 93-100. 10.1056/NEJM199901143400203.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Goeree R, Gully PR: The burden of chlamydial and gonococcal infection in Canada. In: Prevention of infertility. Research studies of the Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies. Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services Canada. Edited by: Ronald AR, Peeling RW. 1993, 29-76.Google Scholar
  61. Van Damme L: Advances in topical microbicides. 13th International AIDS Conference, Durban, South Africa (Abstract WeOr62). July 9–14 2000
  62. McKay A: Prevention of sexually transmitted infections in different populations: a review of behaviourally effective and cost-effective interventions. Can J Human Sexuality. 2000, 9 (2): 95-120.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Wong et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd 2004

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement