Satisfaction and quality of life in women who undergo breast surgery: A qualitative study
© Klassen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 17 July 2008
Accepted: 01 May 2009
Published: 01 May 2009
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|17 Jul 2008||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|10 Sep 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Amy Alderman|
|13 Oct 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sophie Staniszewska|
|13 Nov 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Anne Klassen|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|13 Nov 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|12 Mar 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sophie Staniszewska|
|20 Apr 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Anne Klassen|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|20 Apr 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|1 May 2009||Editorially accepted|
|1 May 2009||Article published||10.1186/1472-6874-9-11|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.