Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Protocol for the value of urodynamics prior to stress incontinence surgery (VUSIS) study: a multicenter randomized controlled trial to assess the cost effectiveness of urodynamics in women with symptoms of stress urinary incontinence in whom surgical treatment is considered

  • Sanne AL van Leijsen1Email author,
  • Kirsten B Kluivers1,
  • Ben Willem J Mol2,
  • Suzan R Broekhuis1,
  • Fred L Milani3,
  • C Huub van der Vaart4,
  • Jan-Paul WR Roovers2,
  • Marlies Y Bongers5,
  • Jan den Boon6,
  • Wilbert A Spaans7,
  • Jan Willem de Leeuw8,
  • Viviane Dietz9,
  • Jan H Kleinjan10,
  • Hans AM Brölmann11,
  • Eveline J Roos12,
  • Judith Schaafstra13,
  • John PFA Heesakkers14 and
  • Mark E Vierhout1
BMC Women's Health20099:22

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6874-9-22

Received: 24 June 2009

Accepted: 21 July 2009

Published: 21 July 2009

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
24 Jun 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
19 Jul 2009 Author responded Author comments - sanne van leijsen
Resubmission - Version 3
19 Jul 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
20 Jul 2009 Author responded Author comments - sanne van leijsen
Resubmission - Version 5
20 Jul 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
21 Jul 2009 Editorially accepted
21 Jul 2009 Article published 10.1186/1472-6874-9-22

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
(2)
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam
(3)
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis Delft
(4)
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Academic Medical Centre Utrecht
(5)
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maxima Medical Centre Veldhoven
(6)
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Isala Klinieken Zwolle
(7)
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Gelre Hospital
(8)
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ikazia Hospital Rotterdam
(9)
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven
(10)
Department of Urology, Sint Franciscus Hospital Roosendaal
(11)
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, VU University Medical Center
(12)
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sint Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein
(13)
Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital Nijmegen
(14)
Department of Urology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre

Advertisement