Motivations for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy as a function of socioeconomic status
- Dadrie F. Baptiste†1, 5,
- Erina L. MacGeorge†2,
- Maria K. Venetis3,
- Ashton Mouton3,
- L. Brooke Friley3, 6,
- Rebekah Pastor3, 7,
- Kristen Hatten3, 8,
- Janaka Lagoo1, 9,
- Susan E. Clare4Email author and
- Monet W. Bowling1, 10Email author
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 7 September 2016
Accepted: 27 January 2017
Published: 1 February 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|7 Sep 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|13 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alejandra De Mendoza|
|19 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Susan Vadaparampil|
|18 Nov 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Dadrie Baptiste|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|18 Nov 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|14 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alejandra De Mendoza|
|24 Jan 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Dadrie Baptiste|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|24 Jan 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|27 Jan 2017||Editorially accepted|
|1 Feb 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12905-017-0366-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.