Burden, screening, and treatment of depressive and anxious symptoms among women referred to cardiac rehabilitation: a prospective study
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 5 September 2015
Accepted: 31 January 2017
Published: 7 February 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|5 Sep 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|23 Sep 2015||Author responded||Author comments - Megan Cahill|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|23 Sep 2015||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|16 Dec 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Angele McGrady|
|22 Aug 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joel W. Hughes|
|15 Nov 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Megan Hurley|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|15 Nov 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|2 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Angele McGrady|
|22 Dec 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Megan Hurley|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|22 Dec 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|31 Jan 2017||Editorially accepted|
|7 Feb 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12905-017-0367-1|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.