Skip to main content

Table 2 Bivariate and multivariate analysis of the factors associated with the utilization of cervical cancer screening services among HIV-positive women aged 18-49years at Lira Regional Referral Hospital, Lira City, Northern Uganda

From: Factors associated with utilization of cervical cancer screening services among HIV-positive women aged 18 to 49 years at Lira regional referral hospital, Northern Uganda

Factors

Ever screened

Bivariate analysis

Multivariate analysis

 

No. n (%)

Yes. n (%)

CPR (95% CI)

P-value

APR (95% CI)

P value

Ever heard of CCS

      

No

45(36.9)

24 (13.7)

1.00

   

Yes

77(63.1)

151(86.3)

1.90(1.24–2.93)

0.003*

1.80(1.31–2.49)

< 0.001**

Know where CCS is done

      

No

44(36.1)

21(12.0)

1.00

   

Yes

78(63.9)

154(88.0)

2.05(1.30–3.24)

0.002*

1.99(1.42–2.81)

< 0.001**

Partner support in HIV treatment

      

No

43(35.2)

53(30.3)

1.00

   

Yes

77(63.2)

118(67.4)

1.10(0.79–1.52)

0.579

  

No partner

2(1.6)

4(2.3)

1.21(0.44–3.34)

0.716

  

Embarrassed by the procedure

      

No

87(71.3)

130(74.3)

1.00

   

Yes

35(28.7)

45(25.7)

0.94(0.67–1.32)

0.716

  

Fear outcomes of screening

      

No

63(51.6)

131(74.9)

1.00

   

Yes

59(48.4)

44(25.1)

0.63(0.45–0.89)

0.009*

0.67(0.54–0.84)

< 0.001**

Think screening is beneficial

      

No

21(17.2)

23(13.1)

1.00

   

Yes

86(70.5)

147(84.0)

1.21(0.78–1.87)

0.402

0.85(0.65–1.12)

0.252

I don’t know

15(12.3)

5(2.9)

0.48(0.18–1.26)

0.135*

0.39(0.20–0.75)

0.005**

Received HPV vaccination

      

No

76(62.3)

101(57.7)

1.00

   

Yes

46(37.7)

74(42.3)

1.08(0.80–1.46)

0.612

  

Have friends/relatives who screened

      

No

61(50.0)

58(33.1)

1.00

   

Yes

61(50.0)

117(66.9)

1.35(0.98–1.85)

0.063*

1.31(1.09–1.59)

0.005**

Distance to the facility

      

Near

62(50.8)

88(50.3)

1.00

   

Far

31(25.4)

50(28.6)

1.05(0.74–1.49)

0.774

  

Very far

29(23.8)

37(21.1)

0.96(0.65–1.40)

0.817

  

Health education on CCS

      

No

51(41.8)

51 (29.1)

1.00

   

Yes

71(58.2)

124(70.9)

1.27(0.92–1.76)

0.148*

  

CCS appointments at the facility

      

No

40(32.8)

41(23.4)

1.00

   

Yes

82(67.2)

134(76.6)

1.23(0.86–1.74)

0.254

  

Conduct CCS outreaches

      

No

43(35.2)

39(22.3)

1.00

   

Yes

75(61.5)

130(74.3)

1.33(0.93–1.91)

0.115*

  

I don’t know

4(3.3)

6(3.4)

1.26(0.53–2.98)

0.596

  

Provider recommendation

      

No

26(21.3)

21(12.0)

1.00

   

Yes

94(77.1)

152(86.9)

1.38(0.88–2.18)

0.164*

  

I don’t know

2(1.6)

2(1.1)

1.12(0.26–4.77)

0.879

  

Convenient hours for CCS

      

No

47(38.5)

54(30.9)

1.00

   

Yes

56(45.9)

110(62.9)

1.24(0.89–1.72)

0.196*

  

I don’t know

19(15.6)

11(6.2)

0.69(0.36–1.31)

0.254

  

Availability of CCS services

      

No

15(12.3)

15(8.6)

1.00

   

Yes

80(65.6)

144(82.3)

1.29(0.76–2.19)

0.133*

  

I don’t know

27(22.1)

16(9.1)

0.74(0.75–2.18)

0.278

  
  1. Factors associated with the utilization of cervical cancer screening services among HIV-positive women aged 18–49 years. CCS- Cervical Cancer Screening, CPR- crude prevalence ratio at 95% confidence interval, APR- Adjusted prevalence ratio, CI- Confidence interval, *significant at p < 0.2. **significant at p < 0.05