Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Adverse outcomes after colposcopy

  • Sarah M Flanagan1,
  • Sue Wilson1Email author,
  • David Luesley1,
  • Sarah L Damery1 and
  • Sheila M Greenfield1
BMC Women's Health201111:2

Received: 9 December 2010

Accepted: 20 January 2011

Published: 20 January 2011

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
9 Dec 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 Dec 2010 Author responded Author comments - sarah flanagan
Resubmission - Version 3
20 Dec 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
20 Jan 2011 Editorially accepted
20 Jan 2011 Article published 10.1186/1472-6874-11-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Primary Care Clinical Sciences, The University of Birmingham