Table 1 Bivariate analysis between induced abortions and voluntary family planning dimensions and socio-demographic characteristics
Ever had induced abortions (n = 935) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Voluntary Family Planning dimensions | 0 | 1 | ≥2 | P -value |
Counselling | 0.054 | |||
No | 61.3 | 25.5 | 13.2 | |
Yes | 68.8 | 21.0 | 10.2 | |
Information for making informed choice | 0.371 | |||
No | 65.3 | 22.5 | 12.2 | |
Yes | 68.8 | 21.3 | 9.9 | |
Access/availability to selected method(s) | 0.813 | |||
No | 64.0 | 24.2 | 11.8 | |
Yes | 65.8 | 22.4 | 11.9 | |
Counselling + information | 0.083 | |||
No | 61.6 | 25.4 | 13.1 | |
Yes | 68.5 | 21.2 | 10.4 | |
All three components | 0.105 | |||
No | 60.2 | 27.2 | 12.7 | |
Yes | 66.9 | 21.7 | 11.5 | |
Age at interview | 0.000 | |||
18–24 | 89.9 | 10.1 | 0.0 | |
25–34 | 77.0 | 17.8 | 5.2 | |
35–49 | 56.5 | 26.6 | 16.9 | |
Place of residents | 0.000 | |||
Rural | 70.1 | 21.4 | 8.5 | |
Urban | 59.7 | 23.4 | 16.9 | |
Ethnicity | 0.052 | |||
Kinh | 68.9 | 22.8 | 8.3 | |
Others (ethnic minorities) | 65.3 | 21.8 | 13.0 | |
Education | 0.706 | |||
Primary and secondary | 66.9 | 22.3 | 10.8 | |
High school and higher (college/university) | 66.1 | 21.6 | 10.3 | |
Occupation | 0.002 | |||
Others | 60.1 | 25.9 | 14.1 | |
Farmers | 69.9 | 20.1 | 10.1 | |
Wealth index (quintiles) | 0.001 | |||
Lowest | 74.3 | 18.5 | 7.2 | |
Second | 71.0 | 21.0 | 7.9 | |
Middle | 66.5 | 22.7 | 10.8 | |
Fourth | 62.5 | 23.7 | 13.8 | |
Highest | 57.7 | 24.4 | 17.9 | |
Number of living children | 0.000 | |||
1 | 78.7 | 16.4 | 4.9 | |
2 | 61.6 | 23.9 | 14.5 | |
3+ | 53.8 | 29.8 | 16.4 | |
Sex of previous child (children) | 0.074 | |||
Male | 63.3 | 23.9 | 12.8 | |
Female | 69.3 | 20.3 | 10.4 | |
Ever used contraceptives (couple methods) | ||||
No | 70.2 | 18.9 | 10.9 | 0.008 |
Yes | 61.8 | 25.9 | 12.3 | |
Ever used contraceptives (female methods) | ||||
No | 76.8 | 17.9 | 5.3 | 0.000 |
Yes | 62.7 | 23.6 | 13.7 | |