Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Supracervical hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: perceived effects on sexual function

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
17 Sep 2001 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
15 Oct 2001 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hatem Mousa
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
17 Dec 2001 Author responded Author comments - Eric Scott Sills
Resubmission - Version 6
17 Dec 2001 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
8 Jan 2002 Author responded Author comments - Eric Scott Sills
Resubmission - Version 9
8 Jan 2002 Submitted Manuscript version 9
15 Jan 2002 Author responded Author comments - Eric Scott Sills
Resubmission - Version 10
15 Jan 2002 Submitted Manuscript version 10
Publishing
17 Jan 2002 Editorially accepted
17 Jan 2002 Article published 10.1186/1472-6874-2-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement