Management of abnormal uterine bleeding by northern, rural and isolated primary care physicians: PART II: What do we need?
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|20 Jun 2002||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|4 Jul 2002||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - George Vilos|
|3 Sep 2002||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Barlow|
|3 Sep 2002||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Malcolm Munro|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|16 Oct 2002||Author responded||Author comments - Donna E. Stewart|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|16 Oct 2002||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|13 Nov 2002||Author responded||Author comments - Donna E. Stewart|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|13 Nov 2002||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|20 Nov 2002||Editorially accepted|
|20 Nov 2002||Article published||10.1186/1472-6874-2-11|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.