Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Management of abnormal uterine bleeding by northern, rural and isolated primary care physicians: PART II: What do we need?

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
20 Jun 2002 Submitted Original manuscript
4 Jul 2002 Reviewed Reviewer Report - George Vilos
3 Sep 2002 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Barlow
3 Sep 2002 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Malcolm Munro
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
16 Oct 2002 Author responded Author comments - Donna E. Stewart
Resubmission - Version 4
16 Oct 2002 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
13 Nov 2002 Author responded Author comments - Donna E. Stewart
Resubmission - Version 6
13 Nov 2002 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
20 Nov 2002 Editorially accepted
20 Nov 2002 Article published 10.1186/1472-6874-2-11

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement