Trends in complementary/alternative medicine use by breast cancer survivors: Comparing survey data from 1998 and 2005
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|9 Aug 2006||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|8 Sep 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paul Shekelle|
|22 Nov 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lynda Balneaves|
|29 Nov 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Eileen Rakovitch|
|28 Dec 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Heather Boon|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|28 Dec 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|7 Feb 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Eileen Rakovitch|
|13 Feb 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paul Shekelle|
|23 Feb 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lynda Balneaves|
|26 Mar 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Heather Boon|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|26 Mar 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|29 Mar 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Heather Boon|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|29 Mar 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|30 Mar 2007||Editorially accepted|
|30 Mar 2007||Article published||10.1186/1472-6874-7-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.