Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Group versus individual sessions delivered by a physiotherapist for female urinary incontinence: an interview study with women attending group sessions nested within a randomised controlled trial

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
13 Jun 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
9 Jul 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Charis Glazener
10 Jul 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dudley Robinson
26 Jan 2009 Author responded Author comments - Sarah (Sallie) Lamb
Resubmission - Version 2
26 Jan 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
9 Jun 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Richard Berger
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
18 Aug 2009 Author responded Author comments - Sarah (Sallie) Lamb
Resubmission - Version 4
18 Aug 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 4
4 Sep 2009 Author responded Author comments - Sarah (Sallie) Lamb
Resubmission - Version 5
4 Sep 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
10 Sep 2009 Editorially accepted
10 Sep 2009 Article published 10.1186/1472-6874-9-25

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement