Group versus individual sessions delivered by a physiotherapist for female urinary incontinence: an interview study with women attending group sessions nested within a randomised controlled trial
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|13 Jun 2008||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|9 Jul 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Charis Glazener|
|10 Jul 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dudley Robinson|
|26 Jan 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Sarah (Sallie) Lamb|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|26 Jan 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|9 Jun 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Richard Berger|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|18 Aug 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Sarah (Sallie) Lamb|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|18 Aug 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|4 Sep 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Sarah (Sallie) Lamb|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|4 Sep 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|10 Sep 2009||Editorially accepted|
|10 Sep 2009||Article published||10.1186/1472-6874-9-25|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.