Open Peer Review Reports for: Normal reference values of strength in pelvic floor muscle of women: a descriptive and inferential study
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 19 Jun 2014 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 22 Jun 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Antonio Ignacio Cuesta-Vargas |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 22 Jun 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 25 Jul 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carmen Suárez |
| 30 Aug 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Edward Araujo Júnior |
| 8 Sep 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Esther Medrano-Sánchez |
| 28 Sep 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Antonio Ignacio Cuesta-Vargas |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 28 Sep 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 14 Oct 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carmen Suárez |
| 14 Oct 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Edward Araujo Júnior |
| 15 Oct 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Esther Medrano-Sánchez |
| 23 Oct 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Antonio Ignacio Cuesta-Vargas |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 23 Oct 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Publishing | ||
| 28 Oct 2014 | Editorially accepted | |
| 25 Nov 2014 | Article published | 10.1186/s12905-014-0143-4 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
