Skip to main content

Table 4 A comparison of the coefficients between the high and low unmet need regions: The application of seemingly unrelated estimation regression

From: Regional differences in unmet need for contraception in Kenya: insights from survey data

Ā 

Model 2 versus model 1

Model 4 versus model 3

(Unmet need to space in high vs low unmet need zones)

(Unmet need to limit in high vs low unmet need zones)

Maternal age

Model 2 (Ī²)

Model 1 (Ī²)

Model 4 (Ī²)

Model 3 (Ī²)

45ā€“49 (Ref)

ā€ƒ15ā€“19

3.49a

-.018

2.50a

āˆ’13.86a

ā€ƒ20ā€“24

3.43a

-.112

3.11a

.269

ā€ƒ25ā€“29

2.98a

-.203

2.28a

-.139

ā€ƒ30ā€“34

2.72a

-.077

2.12a

.034

ā€ƒ35ā€“39

1.97a

.403a

1.19a

.490a

ā€ƒ40ā€“44

0.36

.727a

.914a

.124

Number of living children

0ā€“2 (Ref)

ā€ƒ3 to 5

0.17

1.05a

.119

.892a

ā€ƒ6+

0.26a

1.62a

.651a

1.86a

Place of residence

Rural (Ref)

ā€ƒUrban

0.47b

.187

1.31a

-.387

Maternal education

Secondary completeā€‰+ā€‰(Ref)

ā€ƒNone

0.45a

.714a

.785a

.353b

ā€ƒPrimary incomplete

0.45a

.726a

.830a

.189

ā€ƒPrimary complete

0.13

.576a

.177

.113

ā€ƒSecondary incomplete

0.18

-.194

.227

āˆ’1.17a

Spousal education

Secondary completeā€‰+ā€‰(Ref)

ā€ƒNone

0.07

.273a

.625a

-.314b

ā€ƒPrimary

āˆ’0.49b

.287b

1.47a

-.292

ā€ƒSecondary incomplete

āˆ’0.33a

-.590a

-.204

-.750a

Household wealth index

Poor (Ref)

ā€ƒMiddle

āˆ’0.58a

-.257a

-.264

-.562a

ā€ƒRich

0.33a

.062

-.204

.272b

Religion

Protestants/other (Ref)

ā€ƒRoman catholic

0.35a

-.424a

-.264

āˆ’1.06a

ā€ƒMuslims

0.45a

-.076

.332b

1.31a

Ļ‡ 2 test

Ā 

1065.13

Ā 

1062.6

df

Ā 

21

Ā 

20

p-value

Ā 

0.000

Ā 

0.000

  1. apā€‰<ā€‰0.000
  2. bpā€‰<ā€‰0.05