Themes | Never screened | Screened once | Screened on schedule |
---|---|---|---|
Knowledge and information about the disease and related services | Knew the disease can be prevented and treated. | Same issues as in the never screened group | Same issues as in the never screened group |
Knew that early diagnosis and early treatment is important in management | Same as in the never screened group | Same as in the never screed group | |
All were aware of cervical screening as one of the methods of prevention but did not know how often they needed to screen | Same issues as in the never screened group | Same as in the never screened group | |
All lacked information on the available methods of treatment | Same as in the never screened group | Same as in the never screened group | |
.Risk Perception | All knew they were at high risk because of their HIV status and felt susceptible because they were sexually active | Same as in the never screened group | Same as in the never screened group |
However, they did not feel they were immediately at risk because they had not experienced suspicious symptoms | However, some felt they were not at much risk as such because they had not experienced symptoms | Some screened as part of the routine tests while others felt at greater risk because they had experienced suspicious symptoms “a warning sign” | |
Barriers to screening | Fear of side effects | Other conditions: menstrual periods, pregnancy | No issues raised against repeat screening but some had concerns about feedback after screening and long waiting time |
Poor health e.g. severe wasting and bad skin conditions which they could not expose to health workers | Forgetting due date for next screening and lack of reminders | ||
Having more important health priorities (low prioritization of cervical screening over other services) | Not clear about schedule and reasons for repeat | ||
Other social/family priorities; lack of time for screening Other conditions: menstrual periods, pregnancy, poor hygiene | Concerns about adequate space and privacy | ||
Myths and misconceptions from other clients: providers remove ovaries, flesh, and uterus during the screening | Â | ||
Fears: invasion into one’s privacy; fear of undressing; an additional bad diagnosis on top of existing diseases | |||
Facility issues: long waiting time, inadequate education | |||
Motivation for screening | The only reason for screening was the generic perceived risk due to HIV status and being sexually active | Suspicious symptoms | Findings identical to those who screened once |
 | Being HIV positive, sexually active, and at higher risk | ||
Seek treatment/ensure protection | |||
Maintain a good relationship with the health workers | |||
Experiences with screening | Cited experiences shared by those that underwent screening (negative issues presented above) | The experience was satisfying, painless | The experience was satisfying, painless |
Cervical cancer screening education | Health education is not informative enough and poorly structured limiting accessibility | Same as in the never screened group | Same as in the never screened group |