Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal sacrospinous fixation for vaginal vault prolapse, a randomized controlled trial: SALTO-2 trial, study protocol

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
29 Jan 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
18 Jul 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Beri Ridgeway
1 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kim Notten
2 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Patrick Dällenbach
4 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Anne-Lotte Coolen
Resubmission - Version 2
4 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
29 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Anne-Lotte Coolen
Resubmission - Version 3
29 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
22 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Anne-Lotte Coolen
Resubmission - Version 4
22 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
13 Jul 2017 Editorially accepted
26 Jul 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12905-017-0402-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement