Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Implications of male circumcision for women in Papua New Guinea: a transformational grounded theory study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
19 Nov 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
10 Jun 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joseph De Santis
20 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Colleen Fisher
30 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Michelle Louise Redman-MacLaren
Resubmission - Version 2
30 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
11 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Colleen Fisher
29 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Michelle Louise Redman-MacLaren
Resubmission - Version 3
29 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
14 Jul 2017 Editorially accepted
27 Jul 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12905-017-0406-y

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement