Skip to main content

Table 3 Assault characteristics by assailant-survivor relationship type among women presenting to sexual assault treatment centres in Ontario

From: A comparison of intimate partner and other sexual assault survivors’ use of different types of specialized hospital-based violence services

Assault characteristic

Current/former intimate partner

Other known assailant

Stranger

p value

Type of sex actsa

n = 117 (%)

n = 391 (%)

n = 111 (%)

 

 Cunnilingus

11 (9.4)

55 (14.1)

3 (2.7)

0.003

 Fellatio

13 (11.1)

59 (15.1)

13 (11.7)

0.434

 Completed vaginal penetration (with penis)

77 (65.8)

220 (56.3)

55 (49.5)

0.043

 Completed anal/rectal penetration (with penis)

16 (13.7)

26 (6.6)

10 (9.0)

0.054

Tactics useda

n = 114 (%)

n = 354 (%)

n = 100 (%)

 

 None

7 (6.1)

47 (13.3)

13 (13.0)

0.111

 Physical violence (restrained/pushed/slapped/beaten/ strangled/stabbed)

92 (80.7)

174 (49.2)

58 (58.0)

<0.001

 Verbal coercion (threatened/manipulated)

49 (43.0)

91 (25.7)

21 (21.0)

<0.001

 Altered consciousness (sleeping, forced to drink alcohol/drugged)

13 (11.4)

104 (29.4)

25 (25.0)

.001

Weapon

n = 110 (%)

n = 329 (%)

n = 94 (%)

.109

10 (9.1)

13 (4.0%)

6 (6.4)

 

Physical injuries

n = 109 (%)

n = 378 (%)

n = 108 (%)

<0.001

58 (53.2)

122 (32.3%)

36 (33.3)

 
  1. aCategories are not mutually exclusive