Skip to main content

Table 5 Logistic regression predicting the odds of changing CMV sharing prevention behaviors in the desired direction

From: Effectiveness of message framing on women’s intention to perform cytomegalovirus prevention behaviors: a cross-sectional study

 

Sharing food with a child

Sharing cups with a child

Sharing utensils with a child

 

A Lot Less Often

A Little Less Often

A Lot Less Often

A Little Less Often

A Lot Less Often

A Little Less Often

 

n = 397

n = 217

n = 445

n = 177

n = 452

n = 187

 

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

Pre-Survey Behavior Frequencya

0.82 (0.70–0.98)

0.98 (0.83–1.16)

0.96 (0.83–1.11)

1.19 (1.02–1.38)

0.92 (0.79–1.07)

1.14 (0.96–1.34)

Knowledge Scaleb

1.06 (0.97–1.15)

1.03 (0.95–1.12)

1.07 (0.99–1.15)

1.00 (0.91–1.08)

1.03 (0.95–1.11)

0.99 (0.90–1.07)

Message Credibilityc

1.31 (1.06–1.61)

1.16 (0.94–1.42)

1.27 (1.03–1.55)

1.14 (0.92–1.41)

1.43 (1.17–1.76)

1.28 (1.03–1.59)

Perceived Severityc

1.56 (1.25–1.94)

1.19 (0.98–1.45)

1.39 (1.13–1.70)

1.32 (1.06–1.63)

1.37 (1.12–1.69)

1.25 (1.01–1.55)

Response Efficacyd,e x Gain Frame

2.49 (1.74–3.56)

1.24 (0.94–1.64)

2.69 (1.85–3.90)

1.11 (0.80–1.54)

2.42 (1.71–3.44)

1.13 (0.83–1.53)

Response Efficacyd,e x Loss Frame

3.19 (2.19–4.63)

1.54 (1.15–2.05)

3.63 (2.37–5.56)

1.24 (0.87–1.76)

3.28 (2.18–4.94)

1.69 (1.19–2.41)

Perceived Behavioral Controlc,e x Gain Frame

2.23 (1.76–2.81)

1.32 (1.10–1.59)

1.91 (1.49–2.43)

1.12 (0.90–1.39)

1.91 (1.50–2.42)

1.22 (0.98–1.52)

Perceived Behavioral Controlc,e x Loss Frame

1.81 (1.44–2.28)

1.06 (0.89–1.27)

1.57 (1.20–2.05)

1.06 (0.84–1.34)

1.57 (1.22–2.03)

0.94 (0.75–1.17)

  1. Note. Confidence intervals that are statistically significant are bolded
  2. aParticipation in the behavior that is being modeled. The odds ratio shown is for a one-step increase in participation of behavior (e.g. from 1 to 2 days per week to 3–5 days per week)
  3. bHigher values indicate higher levels of CMV knowledge
  4. cResponses on a 7-point Likert scale where 1 = Strongly Disagree and 7 = Strongly Agree
  5. dBehavior-specific perceived behavioral control and response efficacy use for each model
  6. eResponses on a 5-point Likert scale where 1 = Not at all effective and 5 = Very effective