Table 3 Logistic regression models of “use of modern contraception” among married women in the DRC
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
OR [95% CI] | OR [95% CI] | OR [95% CI] | |
Women’s autonomy | 1.28 [1.18,1.40]*** | 1.19 [1.08,1.31]*** | 1.16 [1.05,1.29]** |
Level of education | |||
No education | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
Primary education | 1.31 [0.91,1.88] | 1.18 [0.82,1.70] | |
Secondary education | 2.82 [1.95,4.07]*** | 2.41 [1.65,3.51]*** | |
Higher education | 3.29 [1.75,6.17]*** | 2.90 [1.50,5.58]** | |
Wealth quintiles | |||
Poorest | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
Poorer | 1.59 [1.09,2.32]* | 1.48 [1.01,2.17]* | |
Middle | 1.78 [1.23,2.60]** | 1.46 [0.99,2.14] | |
Richer | 3.06 [2.13,4.40]*** | 1.86 [1.26,2.75]** | |
Richest | 4.94 [3.39,7.21]*** | 2.18 [1.36,3.49]** | |
Currently working | |||
No | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
Yes | 1.00 [0.80,1.24] | 1.00 [0.79,1.26] | |
Age of respondents | 0.97 [0.95,0.99]* | ||
Residence of province | |||
Kinshasa | 1.00 | ||
Bandundu | 1.05 [0.68,1.60] | ||
Bas-Congo | 2.82 [1.81,4.39]*** | ||
Equateur | 0.42 [0.25,0.70]*** | ||
Kasai-Occidental | 0.66 [0.40,1.08] | ||
Kasai-Oriental | 0.51 [0.32,0.80]** | ||
Katanga | 0.46 [0.30,0.71]*** | ||
Maniema | 0.61 [0.33,1.11] | ||
Nord-Kivu | 1.26 [0.80,2.00] | ||
Orientale | 0.75 [0.47,1.19] | ||
Sud-Kivu | 0.77 [0.44,1.35] | ||
Urban-rural residence | |||
Urban | 1.00 | ||
Rural | 0.44 [0.33,0.58]*** | ||
Religious affiliations | |||
Christian | 1.00 | ||
Non-Christian | 1.30 [0.82,2.06] | ||
Number of children | |||
Less than three | 1.00 | ||
Three to five | 1.03 [0.79,1.35] | ||
More than five | 1.30 [0.87,1.94] | ||
Wald chi-square | 33.19 (1)*** | 332.07 (9)*** | 402.35 (24)*** |
Pseudo r-square | 0.01 | 0.10 | 0.13 |
Log pseudo-likelihood | − 1701.6 | − 1550.5 | − 1490.8 |