Skip to main content

Table 1 Patient characteristics and pathological findings

From: Efficacy and safety outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy in Chinese older women with cervical cancer compared with laparoscopic radical hysterectomy

Characteristics RRH group
(n = 30)
LRH group
(n = 30)
P value
Agea, yr 65(62-67) 64(62-66) 0.404
History of previous abdominal surgeries, n (%) 12(40.0) 15(50.0) 0.436
FIGO stages, n (%) 0.532
 IA 5(16.7) 7(23.3)  
 IB1 16(53.3) 14(46.7)  
 IB2 1(3.3) 3(10.0)  
 IIA 4(13.3) 4(13.3)  
 IIB 4(13.3) 2(6.7)  
Cell types, n (%) 0.380
 Squamous 18(60.0) 21(70.0)  
 Adenoid 10(33.3) 8(26.7)  
 Neuroendocrine 2(6.7) 1(3.3)  
 Uterine sizea, cm3 153.13(120.00-240.75) 191.29(147.09-223.62) 0.352
 Tumor sizea, cm3 4.95(1.43-9.54) 4.76(2.32-11.9) 0.767
 Vaginal lengtha, cm 1.50(1.00-2.30) 1.35(1.00-2.00) 0.337
 Left pelvic lymph nodesa, n 9.0(7.0-14.0) 8.5(6.0-13.0) 0.727
 Right pelvic lymph nodesa, n 10.5(7.0-12.0) 10.0(7.0-11.0) 0.541
 Left pelvic lymph node metastasisa, n 0(0-0) 0(0-1.0) 0.549
 Right pelvic lymph node metastasisa, n 0(0-0) 0(0-0.5) 0.869
  1. Notes: amedian (interquartile range). Abbreviations: RRH robotic radical hysterectomy, LRH laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, FIGO International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics