Skip to main content

Table 1 Patient characteristics and pathological findings

From: Efficacy and safety outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy in Chinese older women with cervical cancer compared with laparoscopic radical hysterectomy

Characteristics

RRH group

(n = 30)

LRH group

(n = 30)

P value

Agea, yr

65(62-67)

64(62-66)

0.404

History of previous abdominal surgeries, n (%)

12(40.0)

15(50.0)

0.436

FIGO stages, n (%)

0.532

 IA

5(16.7)

7(23.3)

 

 IB1

16(53.3)

14(46.7)

 

 IB2

1(3.3)

3(10.0)

 

 IIA

4(13.3)

4(13.3)

 

 IIB

4(13.3)

2(6.7)

 

Cell types, n (%)

0.380

 Squamous

18(60.0)

21(70.0)

 

 Adenoid

10(33.3)

8(26.7)

 

 Neuroendocrine

2(6.7)

1(3.3)

 

 Uterine sizea, cm3

153.13(120.00-240.75)

191.29(147.09-223.62)

0.352

 Tumor sizea, cm3

4.95(1.43-9.54)

4.76(2.32-11.9)

0.767

 Vaginal lengtha, cm

1.50(1.00-2.30)

1.35(1.00-2.00)

0.337

 Left pelvic lymph nodesa, n

9.0(7.0-14.0)

8.5(6.0-13.0)

0.727

 Right pelvic lymph nodesa, n

10.5(7.0-12.0)

10.0(7.0-11.0)

0.541

 Left pelvic lymph node metastasisa, n

0(0-0)

0(0-1.0)

0.549

 Right pelvic lymph node metastasisa, n

0(0-0)

0(0-0.5)

0.869

  1. Notes: amedian (interquartile range). Abbreviations: RRH robotic radical hysterectomy, LRH laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, FIGO International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics