Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparison of the indocyanine green dye method versus the combined method of indigo carmine blue dye with indocyanine green fluorescence imaging for sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast conservative therapy for stage ≤IIA breast cancer

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
7 Dec 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
27 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Benjamin Calhoun
24 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elena Provenzano
14 May 2018 Author responded Author comments - Nobuyuki Takemoto
Resubmission - Version 2
14 May 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 Jun 2018 Author responded Author comments - Nobuyuki Takemoto
Resubmission - Version 3
10 Jun 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
31 Jul 2018 Author responded Author comments - Nobuyuki Takemoto
Resubmission - Version 4
31 Jul 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
12 Sep 2018 Editorially accepted
18 Sep 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12905-018-0646-5

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement