Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Pupil’s perspectives on female genital cutting abandonment in Harari and Somali regions of Ethiopia

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
26 Apr 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
30 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Asresash Abathun
Resubmission - Version 2
30 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
31 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Asresash Abathun
Resubmission - Version 3
31 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
17 Jan 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Janice Rymer
13 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nazar Shabila
16 Apr 2018 Author responded Author comments - Asresash Abathun
Resubmission - Version 4
16 Apr 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
27 Apr 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nazar Shabila
16 Jul 2018 Author responded Author comments - Asresash Abathun
Resubmission - Version 5
16 Jul 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 5
30 Jul 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nazar Shabila
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
24 Sep 2018 Editorially accepted
17 Oct 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12905-018-0653-6

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement