Table 3 Logistic regression analysis of factors associated with ever receiving a positive HR-HPV DNA test result among women who had at least one HR-HPV DNA test through NJCEED, 2009–2015
| Â | Proportion that ever received a positive HR-HPV test result (%) | Unadjusted OR (95% CI) | Multivariable-adjusted OR (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|
Age at enrollment into NJCEED (years) | |||
 29–39 | 21.7 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.00 (ref) |
 40–49 | 12.2 | 0.50 (0.44–0.57) | 0.46 (0.40–0.52) |
  ≥ 50 | 10.7 | 0.44 (0.38–0.50) | 0.40 (0.35–0.46) |
Race/ethnicity | |||
 Non-Hispanic White | 16.4 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.00 (ref) |
 Non-Hispanic Black | 12.4 | 0.72 (0.61–0.85) | 0.75 (0.62–0.90) |
 Asian/Pacific Islander | 9.2 | 0.52 (0.41–0.66) | 0.94 (0.58–1.51) |
 Hispanic | 13.1 | 0.77 (0.68–0.87) | 0.66 (0.55–0.79) |
Country/region of birth | |||
 USA | 15.1 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.00 (ref) |
 Central and South America | 13.5 | 0.88 (0.78–0.99) | 0.96 (0.81–1.15) |
 Caribbean | 13.0 | 0.84 (0.71–0.98) | 1.07 (0.88–1.29) |
 Africa | 7.8 | 0.48 (0.29–0.77) | 0.54 (0.33–0.89) |
 Asia and the Middle East | 8.8 | 0.54 (0.43–0.68) | 0.53 (0.33–0.86) |
 Europe, Russia and Australia and Oceania | 11.2 | 0.71 (0.53–0.93) | 0.63 (0.47–0.84) |
 Other countriesa | 14.6 | 0.96 (0.74–1.25) | 1.01 (0.77–1.32) |
Number of cervical screening visits | |||
 1 | 11.5 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.00 (ref) |
 2 | 14.0 | 1.26 (1.11–1.43) | 1.31 (1.15–1.49) |
  ≥ 3 | 18.5 | 1.75 (1.55–1.98) | 1.86 (1.64–2.11) |
Proportion of residents in ZCTA who are below the FPL | |||
 Quintile 1 (0.0–6.9%) | 11.7 | 1.00 (ref) | 1.00 (ref) |
 Quintile 2 (7.0–10.8%) | 14.6 | 1.29 (1.10–1.52) | 1.23 (1.04–1.45) |
 Quintile 3 (10.9–18.5%) | 16.1 | 1.45 (1.23–1.70) | 1.46 (1.24–1.72) |
 Quintile 4 (18.7–23.7%) | 12.6 | 1.09 (0.92–1.30) | 1.15 (0.96–1.38) |
 Quintile 5 (24.4–100.0%) | 12.5 | 1.08 (0.93–1.26) | 1.12 (0.95–1.32) |
Proportion of minority residents in ZCTA | |||
 Quintile 1 (0.0–26.6%) | 15.2 | 1.00 (ref) |  |
 Quintile 2 (26.7–49.0%) | 16.2 | 1.07 (0.91–1.26) |  |
 Quintile 3 (50.4–76.4%) | 11.0 | 0.69 (0.59–0.81) |  |
 Quintile 4 (76.5–87.2%) | 14.6 | 0.95 (0.80–1.13) |  |
 Quintile 5 (87.8–98.8%) | 11.8 | 0.75 (0.64–0.87) |  |
Proportion of uninsured residents in ZCTA | |||
 Quintile 1 (0.0–13.0%) | 13.0 | 1.00 (ref) |  |
 Quintile 2 (13.1–20.3%) | 15.7 | 1.24 (1.05–1.46) |  |
 Quintile 3 (20.4–28.8%) | 12.8 | 0.97 (0.83–1.14) |  |
 Quintile 4 (29.2–37.9%) | 13.2 | 1.01 (0.86–1.19) |  |
 Quintile 5 (38.1–100.0%) | 12.5 | 0.95 (0.81–1.12) |  |
Proportion of residents in ZCTA who don’t speak English very well | |||
 Quintile 1 (0.0–5.7%) | 16.5 | 1.00 (ref) |  |
 Quintile 2 (5.8–11.3%) | 14.5 | 0.86 (0.73–1.02) |  |
 Quintile 3 (11.4–19.1%) | 11.5 | 0.66 (0.56–0.77) |  |
 Quintile 4 (19.2–34.3%) | 12.3 | 0.71 (0.61–0.83) |  |
 Quintile 5 (34.6–51.6%) | 13.5 | 0.79 (0.67–0.93) |  |