Skip to main content

Table 1 Sociodemographic Characteristics of the Sample and Bivariate and Multivariate Association with Physical and / or Sexual IPV (N = 1800)

From: Mixed methods assessment of women’s risk of intimate partner violence in Nepal

 

Distribution

Multivariate

No.

%

OR

95%CI

Caste

 Uppercaste and relatively advantaged Janajatis

833

46.36

REF

 

 Disadvantaged non-Dalit and Janajatis

812

45.19

1.71**

(1.23, 2.38)

 Dalit and religious minorities

152

8.46

1.46

(0.98, 2.18)

Age at Marriage

  < 15

226

12.56

REF

 

 15–17

646

35.89

0.92

(0.60, 1.41)

 18–20

615

34.17

0.99

(0.65, 1.50)

 21+

313

17.39

0.81

(0.49, 1.35)

Marriage Type

 Arranged w/consent

1148

63.78

REF

 

 Arranged w/o consent

170

9.44

1.32

(0.87, 2.01)

 Love w/fam blessing

185

10.28

0.91

(0.57, 1.45)

 Love w/o fam blessing

297

16.5

0.79

(0.56, 1.12)

Wife Education

1.31

1.10

1.13

(0.94, 1.34)

Husband Education

1.78

1.01

0.88

(0.76, 1.01)

Wife Employment

 Unemployed

941

52.28

REF

 

 Earns less than her husband

521

28.94

1.49*

(1.08, 2.04)

 Earns the same amount as her husband

269

14.94

1.79**

(1.28, 2.50)

 Earns more than her husband

69

3.83

1.44

(0.72, 2.87)

Income Stress

806

44.88

1.59**

(1.22, 2.09)

Marital Communication (mean/SD)

1.89

0.85

0.72**

(0.62, 0.83)

Quarrelling

1208

67.11

4.55**

(3.26, 6.35)

Husband Frequently Drunk

426

23.67

2.38**

(1.69, 3.36)

Wife Exposed to IPV As a Child

380

21.11

1.60**

(1.19, 2.14)

Husband Exposed to IPV As a Child

 No

1159

64.39

REF

 

 Yes

273

15.17

1.64**

(1.17, 2.30)

 Don’t know

368

20.44

1.43*

(1.06, 1.94)

 In-law Violence

184

10.26

2.82**

(2.01, 3.96)

Gender Equitable Attitudes (mean/SD)

1.10

0.49

0.99

(0.96, 1.02)

Gender Equitable Normative Expectations (mean/SD)

1.03

0.54

0.95**

(0.92, 0.98)

District

 Nawalparasi

600

33.33

REF

 

 Chitwan

600

33.33

0.66*

(0.48, 0.91)

 Kapilvastu

600

33.33

0.98

(0.66, 1.44)

  1. Values in bold indicate significant results: *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01