Skip to main content

Table 3 Logistic regression odds of using LAPMs among women (15–49) in Siaya and Busia counties, Kenya

From: Fertility intentions and the adoption of long-acting and permanent contraception (LAPM) among women: evidence from Western Kenya

Explanatory variables Model 0 Model 1 Model 2
OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
Age (Ref: [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24])
 25–39 1.53*** 1.48, 1.59 0.96 0.87, 1.06 1.02 0.92, 1.13
 40+ 1.55*** 1.38, 1.75 0.66*** 0.53, 0.83 0.67** 0.53, 0.85
Number of children (Ref: None)
 1–2 4.24*** 3.95, 4.55 5.22*** 4.64, 5.87 5.06*** 4.43, 5.79
 3–4 7.30*** 6.69, 7.96 7.02*** 6.13, 8.03 6.16*** 5.28, 7.19
 5+ 9.29*** 8.31, 10.37 7.44*** 6.29, 8.79 5.80*** 4.81, 6.99
Level of education (Ref: None)
 Primary incomplete 6.71*** 6.23, 7.22 0.51*** 0.43, 0.59 0.64*** 0.53, 0.77
 Primary complete 3.22*** 3.02, 3.43 0.36*** 0.31, 0.42 0.45*** 0.37, 0.54
 Secondary+ 1.25*** 1.17, 1.34 0.21*** 0.18, 0.24 0.25*** 0.21, 0.31
County (Ref: Siaya)
 Busia 5.96*** 5.62, 6.31 3.77*** 3.36, 4.24 3.63*** 3.22, 4.09
FP service delivery model (Ref: Facility-based)      
 Mobile service 3.77*** 3.63, 3.92 2.55*** 2.29, 2.84 2.50*** 2.23, 2.79
Project status (Ref: New FP user and project beneficiary)
 Existing FP user and new project beneficiary 2.04*** 1.93, 2.15 0.72 0.64, 0.80 0.73*** 0.65, 0.82
 Existing FP user and project beneficiary 0.98 0.94, 1.02 0.38 0.34, 0.43 0.40*** 0.35, 0.45
 2014 1.40*** 1.36, 1.44 1.43 1.26, 1.62 1.61*** 1.41, 1.84
 2015 1.02 0.97, 1.07 0.55 0.48, 0.64 0.65*** 0.56, 0.76
Fertility intentions (Ref: Wants no more children)
 Wants another child within 2 years 1.14 1.06, 1.24    0.30*** 0.24, 0.36
 Wants another child after 2 years 4.80 4.57, 5.05    0.78** 0.66, 0.92
 Missing/Non-numeric response 0.50 0.49, 0.52    0.62*** 0.51, 0.77
Received counseling on (Ref: No)
 Yes 1.39 1.36, 1.43    1.15 0.91, 1.46
  1. **p < 0.01,
  2. ***p < 0.001