Skip to main content

Table 3 Logistic regression showing predictors of sanitary napkin use

From: WASH practices and its association with nutritional status of adolescent girls in poverty pockets of eastern India

Characteristics

Odds ratio

CI (95%)

Socio-demographic

Religion

 Non-Hindu®

  

 Hindu

3.34***

2.37–4.71

Caste

 Scheduled Tribe (ST)®

  

 Scheduled Caste (SC)

0.87

0.63–1.19

 Other Backward Classes (OBCs)

0.85

0.68–1.05

 General

0.95

0.65–1.37

Wealth quintile

 Poorest®

  

 Poor

1.31*

0.96–1.79

 Middle

1.52***

1.13–2.05

 Rich

2.25***

1.67–3.03

 Richest

3.17***

2.33–4.30

Currently attending school

 No®

  

 Yes

2.19***

1.80–2.66

Engaged in paid work outside home

 No®

  

 Yes

0.72***

0.58–0.88

Able to make decision about own healthcare

 No®

  

 Yes

1.21**

1.02–1.45

WASH Practices and Programme Participation

Type of sanitation facility

 Unimproved/Open Defecationa®

  

 Improved

1.34**

1.07–1.68

Accessed adolescent health services organized by health department

 No®

  

 Yes

0.91

0.67–1.25

Visited Anganwadi Centre (AWC) for any service

 No®

  

 Yes

1.07

0.87–1.32

Accessed any health service or counselling from a frontline health worker

 No®

  

 Yes

0.84

0.65–1.08

Attended any Kishori group meetings

 No®

  

 Yes

1.57**

1.10–2.26

  1. Note:® - Reference category; CI confidence interval, ***p < 0.01, **p < 0.05, *p < 0.10
  2. aIn this category majority of the households practiced open defecation (97.8%) whereas only 2.2% used unimproved sanitation facilities