Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Barriers and facilitators to uptake of cervical cancer screening among women in Uganda: a systematic review

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
22 Apr 2019 Submitted Original manuscript
13 May 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Maggie McConnell
21 May 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eva Kantelhardt
10 Jun 2019 Author responded Author comments - Eleanor Black
Resubmission - Version 2
10 Jun 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 2
29 Jun 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eva Kantelhardt
7 Jul 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kath Peters
17 Jul 2019 Author responded Author comments - Eleanor Black
Resubmission - Version 3
17 Jul 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
30 Jul 2019 Author responded Author comments - Eleanor Black
Resubmission - Version 4
30 Jul 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
2 Aug 2019 Editorially accepted
9 Aug 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12905-019-0809-z

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement