Themes | Key Findings |
---|---|
Experiences with GBV | Harassment, threats, and intimidation reportedly occur frequently on both campuses, especially in common places such as the library. |
Female students from both universities reported that IPV and coerced sex are common in students’ relationships. | |
Cases of male teachers manipulating female students’ grades in exchange for sex were reported at both universities. | |
Risk factors for victimization | The low social status of female students and their perceived academic inferiority contribute to their risk of victimization by male peers and faculty. |
Traditional relationship dynamics, such as the obligation for females to have sex, may result in GBV if a female student refuses to have sex or enter a relationship with a male. | |
Female students’ engagement in relationships with males in order to obtain financial support may result in sexual coercion, particularly in combination with substance use. | |
Assigning Blame for Perpetration | Male participants indicated that GBV occurred because female students use male students for personal gain. |
Both male and female participants saw women wearing certain clothing as contributing to GBV and expressed the belief that some men are unable to control their sexual impulses. | |
Both male and female participants accused female students of putting themselves in harm’s way. | |
Victim Support | Peers were identified as a main source of support among victims of GBV. |
Campus resources, including a Gender Office, campus police, and mental health services were often viewed as ineffective. | |
Male students expressed resentment for affirmative action policies and other supports for female students. |