Skip to main content

Table 3 Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis for the association between type of douche and the risk for abnormal cervical lesions

From: Vaginal douching in Zambia: a risk or benefit to women in the fight against cervical cancer: a retrospective cohort study

Characteristic

UOR (95% CI)

p-value

AOR (95% CI)

p-value

Cervical Lesion Status

Negative Positive

n (%) n (%)

Douche

 Plain water

ref

 

ref

 

9545 (87.63)

1348 (12.37)

 Vinegar/lemon/ginger/salt/sugar

5.31 (1.19–23.75)

0.029

7.37 (1.43–38.00)

0.017

4 (57.14)

3 (42.86)

 Feminine wash

0.81 (0.42–1.60)

0.539

0.52 (0.16–1.70)

0.281

87 (89.69)

10 (10.31)

 Soap

0.78 (0.62–0.99)

0.039

0.78 (0.60–1.01)

0.061

744 (90.07)

82 (9.93)

 African herbs/medicine

1.09 (0.38–3.13)

0.874

0.30 (0.40–2.27)

0.245

26 (86.67)

4 (13.33)

Age group

 15–24

ref

 

ref

   

 25–34

1.12 (0.94–1.34)

0.198

1.07 (0.88–1.31)

0.490

  

 35–44

1.13 (0.94–1.36)

0.177

1.04 (0.85–1.28)

0.700

  

 45+

0.79 (0.63–0.99)

0.037

0.79 (0.64–0.99)

0.045

  

Condom use

 Never

ref

 

ref

   

 Sometimes

0.91 (0.81–1.03)

0.143

0.82 (0.72–0.94)

0.006

  

 Almost all the time

0.93 (0.66–1.31)

0.667

0.67 (0.46–0.98)

0.039

  

 Always

0.94 (0.68–1.31)

0.718

0.73 (0.51–1.05)

0.092

  

Occupation

 Housewife

ref

 

ref

   

 Formal employment

0.94 (0.80–1.11)

0.484

0.90 (0.75–1.08)

0.262

  

 Informal employment

0.92 (0.80–1.06)

0.246

0.84 (0.72–0.98)

0.032

  

 Other

1.27 (1.07–1.51)

0.005

1.27 (1.06–1.53)

0.009

  

Life partners

 One sexual partner

ref

 

ref

   

 2–5 sexual partners

1.18 (1.04–1.34)

0.010

1.12 (0.98–1.30)

0.103

  

  > 5 sexual partners

1.58 (1.28–1.96)

< 0.001

1.36 (1.06–1.73)

0.014

  

HIV Status

 HIV+

ref

 

ref

   

 HIV-

0.54 (0.48–0.62)

< 0.001

0.52 (0.45–0.61)

< 0.001

  

 Unknown

0.68 (0.58–0.80)

< 0.001

0.69 (0.57–0.83)

< 0.001