Skip to main content

Table 3 Ordered multi-classification logistic regression model

From: Work-family balance and the subjective well-being of rural women in Sichuan, China

Variables

MODEL 1

MODEL 2

MODEL 3

MODEL 4

subjective well-beinga

(OR)

subjective well-beinga

(OR)

subjective well-beingb

(OR)

subjective well-beingb

(OR)

unhappy

general / unable to judge

happy

very happy

unhappy

general / unable to judge

happy

very happy

unhappy

general / unable to judge

happy

very happy

unhappy

general / unable to judge

happy

very happy

WIF

−0.61

−0.51

−0.81

−1.10b (0.332)

−0.99

−0.76

−1.02

−1.31a (0.270)

−0.79

−0.82

−1.07a (0.345)

−1.35b (0.259)

− 1.02

− 0.94

− 1.15b (0.318)

− 1.45b (0.236)

FIW

0.23

0.40

0.03

0.23

0.34

0.50

0.11

0.24

0.06

0.36

−0.07

0.10

0.03

0.37

−0.11

−0.01

CMC

0.28

0.64a (1.897)

0.63a (1.870)

0.60a (1.822)

0.21

0.63b (1.897)

0.62b (1.852)

0.62a (1.867)

0.47

0.74a (2.09)

0.73a (2.077)

0.66

0.58

0.89b (2.443)

0.88b (2.410)

0.83a (2.291)

SFC

−1.27a (0.280)

−1.32b(0.267)

− 1.21

(0.298)

−0.99

− 1.41b (0.244)

− 1.51b (0.220)

−1.42b (0.242)

− 1.15a (0.315)

−1.58a (0.207)

− 1.54a (0.215)

−1.42a (0.242)

− 1.16

−1.85a (0.158)

− 1.79a (0.166)

−1.68a (0.187)

− 1.36

OLD

        

−1.51a (0.221)

−0.93

−1.05

− 0.91

−2.16c (0.115)

−1.17c (0.311)

− 1.29c (0.276)

−1.18c (0.309)

CHI

        

−2.46b (0.085)

−2.67b (0.069)

−2.64b (0.072)

−1.80

− 2.71c (0.066)

− 2.75c (0.064)

− 2.83c (0.059)

−1.88c (0.153)

FAM

        

0.75

0.87a (2.382)

0.89a (2.44)

0.70

0.86c

0.86c (2.363)

0.89c (2.457)

0.69b (1.952)

WGO

        

−2.00

−2.46

−1.91

−2.69

− 2.88

− 2.60

−2.19

−3.64a (0.026)

PLA

        

−0.77

−0.61

−0.65

−0.23

−1.40

−0.87

−1.08

− 0.59

IND

        

−1.30

−1.07

−1.05

− 1.21

−1.48

− 1.21

−1.17

− 1.51

INC

        

−1.38

−1.15

−1.35

− 1.87

−1.24

−0.53

−0.84

− 1.65

EDU

        

0.26

0.28

0.33b (1.395)

0.41b (1.502)

0.35b (1.413)

0.36b (1.432)

0.41c (1.505)

0.47c (1.593)

MAR

        

0.71

2.05a (7.765)

2.32a (10.15)

1.57

0.70

2.25a (9.450)

2.44b (11.439)

1.84

AGE

        

−0.03

−0.05

−0.06

−0.03

0.02

0.00

−0.02

0.01

N

380

380

380

380

Likelihood ratio tests

Chi-Square = 47.25c df = 16)

Chi-Square = 44.04c (df = 16)

Chi-Square = 99.47c (df = 56)

Chi-Square = 106.1c (df = 56)

Pseudo R2

0.057

0.062

0.12

0.132

  1. Note: Model 2 and Model 4 have added weights. Robust standard errors are in the parentheses. a, b and c represent statistical significance at 0.1, 0.05 and 0.01, respectively. a,b The reference group is ones who chose very unhappy