Skip to main content

Table 4 Prognostic factors for good health estimated by the SF36 subscales Role Function, Physical Function, Vitality and Social Function at 6 year follow-up

From: Prognostic factors for future mental, physical and urogenital health and work ability in women, 45–55 years: a six-year prospective longitudinal cohort study

 

RF n = 71

≥ 84a

PF n = 70

≥ 86a

VT n = 70

≥ 68a

SF n = 70

≥ 88a

Predictors

P-value

Effect sizeb

P-value

Effect sizeb

P-value

Effect sizeb

P-value

Effect sizeb

Agec

0.60

1.06 (0.86–1.3)

1.0

1.0 (0.83–1.2)

0.12

1.3 (0.94–1.7)

0.078

0.12 (0.98–1.5)

Tertiary education

0.12

0.34 (0.089–1.3)

0.78

0.83 (0.22–3.1)

0.033

0.18 (0.035–0.87)

0.0051

0.12 (0.28–0.50)

Work abilityd

0.065

7.3 (0.89–59)

0.028

8.7 (1.3–61)

0.21

5.5 (0.39–80)

0.62

1.6 (0.24–11)

Living with a partner

0.016

32 (1.9–530)

0.87

1.2 (0.12–11)

0.60

0.47 (0.027–8.1)

0.031

21 (1.3–320)

Children at home

0.76

0.78 (0.16–3)

0.19

3.0 (0.59–15)

0.15

4.0 (0.61–26)

0.34

0.46 (0.91–2.3)

Depressione

0.077

0.28 (0.065–1.2)

0.021

0.20 (0.050–0.78)

0.014

0.092 (0.014–0.61)

0.11

0.31 (0.072–1.3)

MRS symptoms

        

Somaticf

0.51

0.45 (0.043–4.7)

0.96

0.96 (0.15–6.2)

0.47

2.6 (0.19–36)

0.23

0.25 (0.025–2.4)

Psychologicf

0.45

0.56 (0.12–2).5)

0.88

1.1 (0.25–5.2)

1.0

0.00 (0.00-∞)

0.25

0.40 (0.085–1.9)

Urogenitalf

0.65

1.4 (0.32–6.2)

0.47

1.7 (0.42–6.6

0.64

1.5 (0.26–8.7)

0.29

0.46 (0.11–2.0)

Active interventiong

0.059

3.0 (0.85–1.04)

0.14

2.6 (0.73–9.4)

0.10

3.4 (0.78–15)

0.065

0.31(0.87–1.1)

Nagelkirke R square

 

0.38

 

0.27

 

0.57

 

0.40

Hosmer-Lemeshow test

0.63

 

0.47

 

0.91

 

0.80

 

Area Under Curvef

0.031

0.65 (0.52–0.78)

0.015

0.68 (0.54–0.81)

0.005

0.70 (0.58–0.83)

0.000

0.82 (0.72–0.91)

Omnibus test of model

0.009

 

0.12

 

< 0.001

 

0.006

 
  1. aCut of for norm Swedish women age 46–54 years, SF36. SF36 subscales; Role function (RF), Physical function (PF), Vitality (VT) and Social function (SF). Higher score indicated better health
  2. bEffect size is Odds Ratio and (95% CI) for all predictors. First figure is p-value, second figure is predicted probability and CI. The odds ratio increase in score value
  3. cOdds Ratio for an increase in age of 1 year between 45 and 55 years
  4. dWorking more than one hour/week
  5. eMontgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score ≥ 7 indicating at least mild depression. Information is missing in 5 women (66/71)
  6. fMenopause Rating Scale and total Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) scoring. Somatic symptoms - hot flushes, heart discomfort, sleeping problems and muscle and joint problems; Psychological symptoms - depressive mood, irritability, anxiety and physical and mental exhaustion; Urogenital symptoms - sexual problems, bladder problems and vaginal dryness. Higher score indicates more severe symptoms
  7. gThe active group intervention is just as an adjustment and it is not the focus of this study