Skip to main content

Table 3 Effect of study variables on use of modern FP using two-level binary logistic regression

From: Factors influencing the use of modern contraceptive in Nigeria: a multilevel logistic analysis using linked data from performance monitoring and accountability 2020

Variable

Unadjusted estimates

Adjusted estimates

Odd ratio

95% C.I

Odd ratio

95% C.I

Age group

 Below 19 years (ref)

1.0

 

1.0

 

 20–29 years

1.7

1.09–2.78α

1.2

0.62–2.23

 30–39 years

1.6

1.00–2.71α

0.9

0.41–2.19

 40 and above

1.6

0.89–2.71

0.8

0.27–2.49

Educational level

 Below secondary (ref)

1.0

 

1.0

 

 Secondary

1.8

1.32–2.48α

1.3

0.93–2.01

 Higher

2.5

1.84–3.38α

1.7

1.07–2.58β

Marital status

 Single/living with partner (ref)

1.0

 

1.0

 

 Currently married

0.7

0.52–0.89α

0.3

0.22–0.45β

 Divorced/Widow/Separated

0.3

0.16–0.68α

0.2

0.08–0.48β

Parity

 None (ref)

1.0

 

1.0

 

 1 to 2

0.9

0.63–1.34

1.3

0.86–1.97

 3 to 4

1.3

1.02–1.76α

1.9

1.32–2.80β

 5 and above

1.4

1.02–1.94α

2.3

1.41–3.70β

Interest in more children

 More children (ref)

1.0

 

1.0

 

 Maybe/No

1.3

1.02–1.70α

1.5

1.12–2.01β

Household wealth quintile

 Below average quintile (ref)

1.0

 

1.0

 

 Average quintile

1.5

1.03–2.17α

1.0

0.78–1.54

 Above average quintile

2.4

1.88–2.94α

1.5

1.06–1.99β

Number of modern FP methods heard of

 at most 4 (ref)

1.0

 

1.0

 

 at least 5

3.2

2.24–4.46α

2.2

1.37–3.39β

Visited by health worker about FP in last 12 months

 No (ref)

1.0

 

1.0

 

 Yes

1.4

1.12–1.68α

0.9

0.68–1.33

Facility visit in the last 12 months

 No visit (ref)

1.0

 

1.0

 

 Visited but No FP talk

1.0

0.76–1.26

0.9

0.68–1.26

 Visited and FP talk

1.5

1.03–2.21α

1.1

0.75–1.74

Attended a community event where FP were favoured

 No (ref)

1.0

 

1.0

 

 Yes

1.2

0.83–1.74

0.

0.49–1.23

Someone in the community favour you if you use FP

 No (ref)

1.0

 

1.0

 

 Yes

2.8

2.32 - 4.216α

2.0

1.59–2.55β

Heard community/religious leader speak in favour of FP

 No (ref)

1.0

 

1.0

 

 Yes

1.5

1.15–1.82α

1.0

0.75–1.32

How many of your close friends or family do you think uses FP

 None/Unknown (ref)

1.0

 

1.0

 

 Some

3.5

2.80–4.42α

2.7

2.06–3.65β

 Most/all

5.1

3.49–7.37α

3.5

2.25–5.43β

Type of residence

 Urban (ref)

1.0

 

1.0

 

 Rural

0.5

0.34–0.65α

1.1

0.69–1.62

No of facility offering FP services in the community

 at most 1 (ref)

1.0

 

1.0

 

 two

1.7

1.09–2.65α

1.2

0.84–1.90

 at least 3

1.4

0.89–2.11

1.0

0.65–1.50

Average number days FP facilities in the communities are opened

 At most 3 days (ref)

1.0

 

1.0

 

 4 to 5 days

2.1

1.16–3.91α

1.1

0.59–2.29

 at least 6 days

2.1

1.13–3.78α

1.0

0.50–1.96

Presence of at least one facility that provide Free FP services

 No (ref)

1.0

 

1.0

 

 Yes

1.6

1.15–2.12α

1.1

0.80–1.62

 Random effect

    

 Variance

0.5

0.36–0.78β

  1. OR Odd Ratio, ref. reference category, C.I Confidence Interval
  2. α significant at p < 0.1, βsignificant at p < 0.05