Skip to main content

Table 3 Key requirements for the design and validation of PBACs

From: Pictorial methods to assess heavy menstrual bleeding in research and clinical practice: a systematic literature review

• Towel and tampon scores must be validated against the AH method

• Scores must be validated for specific towel/tampon brands and for each absorbency category shown on the chart

• To prevent mis-scoring or confusion, there must be clear visual differences between successive icons

• To assess reproducibility during validation, icon scores should be subjected to repeated testing by different women

• The chart must be validated for all levels of MBL (low, normal and high)

• The method should be able to detect clinically relevant differences in MBL following treatment

• The chart design should be simple, straightforward and user friendly, and patients should be thoroughly briefed in its use, particularly in the interpretation of nonstandard staining patterns

• After validation, the format, size and appearance of the chart should not be changed because this may alter a woman’s perception of scoring

• A paper-based version should be conveniently sized and of robust construction. If an electronic version is used, women should be aware of the protocol in cases of data transmission failure

  1. AH alkaline hematin, MBL menstrual blood loss, PBAC pictorial blood loss assessment chart