Skip to main content

Table 3 Unadjusted and adjusted odds of a family planning (FP) versus maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) physician recommending D&E for each case scenario

From: Second-trimester abortion attitudes and practices among maternal-fetal medicine and family planning subspecialists

Case scenario

FP

n (%)

MFM

n (%)

Unadjusted

OR (95% CI)

Adjusteda

OR (95% CI)

Trisomy 21

 Induction recommendation or no recommendationb

21 (20)

401 (59)

 D&E recommendationc

84 (80)

284 (41)

5.7 (3.4–9.3)

3.9 (2.1–7.0)

Renal agenesis

 Induction recommendation or no recommendation

23 (22)

435 (63)

 D&E recommendation

82 (78)

251 (37)

6.2 (3.8–10.1)

4.3 (2.4–7.6)

Intrauterine fetal demise

 Induction recommendation or no recommendation

29 (28)

480 (70)

 D&E recommendation

76 (72)

203 (30)

6.2 (3.9–9.8)

4.2 (2.4–7.3)

Severe pre-eclampsia

Induction recommendation or no recommendation

14 (13)

386 (56)

 D&E recommendation

91 (87)

299 (44)

8.4 (4.7–15.0)

4.6 (2.4–8.8)

Chorioamnionitis with sepsis

 Induction recommendation or no recommendation

17 (16)

411 (60)

 D&E recommendation

88 (84)

275 (40)

7.7 (4.5–13.3)

4.2 (2.2–7.8)

Preterm premature rupture of membranes

 Induction recommendation or no recommendation

35 (34)

549 (80)

 D&E recommendation

69 (66)

137 (20)

7.9 (5.0–12.4)

5.5 (3.1–9.7)

  1. aAdjusted for age, gender, practice setting, religiosity, abortion attitude, provide D&Es
  2. bInduction recommendation or no recommendation includes responses “no recommendation”, “recommend induction”, and “recommend induction, but patient’s choice”
  3. cD&E recommendation includes responses “recommend D&E” and “recommend D&E, but patient’s choice”