Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of participants’ characteristics

From: Alleviating psychological distress associated with a positive cervical cancer screening result: a randomized control trial

 

Intervention group n (%)

Control group n (%)

493 (50.7)

479 (49.3)

Age, years

Mean

44.6 (10.3)

44.9 (10.1)

 20–29

17 (3.5)

15 (3.1)

 30–39

153 (31.0)

133 (27.8)

 40–49

180 (36.5)

184 (38.4)

 50–59

75 (15.2)

75 (15.7)

 60–69

58 (11.8)

55 (11.5)

 Missing

10 (2.0)

17 (3.6)

Educational level

Junior high school

2 (0.4)

4 (0.8)

High school

82 (16.3)

104 (21.7)

Vocational school/junior college

191 (38.7)

184 (38.4)

College/university

214 (43.4)

183 (38.2)

Missing

4 (0.8)

4 (0.8)

Marital status

Married/partnered

441 (89.5)

428 (89.4)

Widowed/divorced

23 (4.7)

27 (5.6)

Single

28 (5.7)

22 (4.6)

Missing

1 (0.2)

2 (0.4)

Occupation

Public officer

87 (17.7)

73 (16.2)

Self-employed

26 (5.3)

21 (4.4)

Part-time job

189 (38.3)

203 (42.4)

Housewife

161 (32.7)

153 (31.9)

None

7 (1.4)

10 (2.1)

Student

8 (1.6)

5 (1.0)

Other

14 (2.8)

12 (2.5)

Missing

1 (0.2)

2 (0.4)

Smoker

At some point

111 (22.5)

128 (26.7)

Never

380 (77.1)

350 (73.1)

Missing

2 (0.4)

1 (0.2)

Childbirth experience

No

69 (14.0)

60 (87.1)

Yes

423 (85.8)

417 (87.1)

Missing

1 (0.2)

2 (0.4)

Diagnosed history of cancer

Yes

18 (3.7)

11 (2.3)

No

447 (90.7)

455 (95.0)

Missing

28 (5.7)

13 (2.7)

Mental health (K6)

Mean K6 score (SD)

3.2 (3.6)

3.0 (3.6)

Missing

11 (2.2)

8 (1.7)

History of cervical cancer screening

Yes

452 (91.7)

438 (91.4)

No

32 (6.5)

26 (5.4)

Missing

9 (1.8)

15 (3.1)

History of positive cervical cancer screening resulta

Yes

29 (6.4)

23 (5.3)

No

406 (89.8)

399 (91.1)

Don’t know

0 (0.0)

1 (0.2)

Missing

17 (3.8)

15 (3.4)

History of further examinationa

Yes

27 (6.0)

22 (5.0)

No

421 (93.1)

410 (93.6)

Missing

4 (0.9)

6 (1.7)

Perceived health competenceb

Mean (SD)

23.6 (3.0)

23.6 (3.0)

Attitude toward cervical cancer screeningb

Barriers toward screening

9.8 (3.7)

9.7 (3.4)

Lack of perceived importance of screening

7.0 (2.3)

7.1 (2.2)

Perceptions of screening

13.0 (3.2)

12.7 (3.0)

Subjective norms related to screening

10.6 (3.4)

10.7 (3.3)

  1. SD standard deviation
  2. aThe proportion of women with a history of positive cervical cancer screening results differs from other variables in the number of denominators. Among the women with a history of cervical cancer screening, this is the proportion with experience of positive results
  3. bThe number is different because the score was calculated by excluding those with missing responses on the questionnaire